For countless months, professionals have warned that COVID-1 9 is not so much a viral pandemic as it is a “casedemic” — a pandemic of false positive exams — and the thing that retained the hoax becoming was the fact that laboratories were applying excessively high cycle thresholds( CTs) when managing the PCR tests. 1
I detailed this programme in “COVID-1 9 Testing Scandal Deepens” and “Astonishing COVID-1 9 Testing Fraud Revealed.” Tests put forward by the World Health Organization were originally set to 45 CTs, 2,3, 4 and the U.S. Middle for Disease Control and Prevention recommend a CT of 40,5 more the scientific consensus has long been that anything over 35 CTs yields the test useless, 6,7, 8 as the accuracy will be a measly 3 %. The remainder, 97%, are false positives. 9
In addition to providing artificially representing an increase of the lawsuit rate, the PCR test fraud too fueled the belief that asymptomatic people posed a possible health menace, and hence organizations had to shut down and everyone had to stay at home and self-quarantine.
January 20, 2021, the working day of Joe Biden’s inauguration as the 46 th president of the United Mood, the WHO unexpectedly lowered the recommended CT, 10 thereby guaranteeing that the number of “cases, ” i.e ., positive PCR test makes, would plummet.
Now, the U.S. Core for Disease Control and Prevention has lowered the CT even further, in what sounds to be a clear effort to hide COVID-1 9 breakthrough occasions, symbolizing instances in which perfectly injected individuals are being diagnosed with COVID-1 9.
How the CDC Is Covering Up Breakthrough Cases
As part of its COVID-1 9 inoculation breakthrough event investigation, the CDC has issued guidelines1 1 for public health, clinical and reference laboratories on how to experiment and diagnose cases where fully inoculated individuals are suspected of having contracted COVID-1 9. In those guidelines, it specifies use a CT value of 28 or less.
So, in other words, while health people have, for the past year, been misdiagnosed as having COVID-1 9 when they genuinely didn’t because the CT was set to 40 or 45, they’re now trying to minimize the recorded number of breakthrough suits by means of a CT that are able to reduce fictitiou positives. 12
Had a CT of 28 been used all along, we would have had nowhere near the number of “cases” currently bragged and the pandemic would therefore be certified over sometime in 2020. Conversely, were a CT of 40 or 45 used to diagnose breakthrough examples, you can be sure the lists would be far higher than currently reported.
Reported Breakthrough Cases Are Undercounted
As of April 26, 2021, the CDC had received a total of 9,245 reports of vaccine breakthrough infections via its national COVID-1 9 vaccine breakthrough REDCap database, into which mood state department examiners can recruit and manage data from their respective provinces. 13
Of those 9,245 breakthrough cases, 55% were under the age of 60, 835 necessitated hospitalization( 9 %) and 132 died( 1 %). With an estimated 95 million Americans having been injected, the reported breakthrough proportion is merely 0.0097%. Nonetheless, the CDC likewise stresses that: 14
“It is important to note that reported vaccine breakthrough suits will be presenting an undercount. This surveillance method is passive and relies on voluntary reporting from state health agencies which may not be complete. Also , not all real-world breakthrough instances will be distinguished because of lack of testing.”
COVID-1 9 Vaccine Side Effects Are Underreported Too
This is worth keeping in mind, as the same applies to reported COVID-1 9 inoculation side effects, which as of April 23, 2021, included a total of 118, 902 adverse events, 12,618 of which were serious and 3,544 of which died. 15
As tragic as those numbers are, these more represent an undercount, as the U.S. inoculation harmful incident reporting organisation( VAERS) is a passive surveillance arrangement that relies on voluntary reporting. Historically, less than 10% of vaccine side effects are reported to VAERS. 16 An investigation by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service framed it as low-pitched as 1 %. 17,18
What this symbolizes is side effects may actually be 10 experiences or even 100 times higher than reported. We could, in reality, be looking at anywhere from 126,000 to 1.2 million serious side effects, and anywhere from 35,440 to 354,400 vaccine-related deaths.
VAERS appears to be backlogged for months. Rare but serious side effects may be appearing but we just can’t consider present trends, and the longer the backlog, the more people will be exposed to a potentially dangerous vaccine.
Right now, it’s likewise difficult to get an accurate idea of where we are with regard to side effects as VAERS appears to be backlogged for months. On Twitter, Alex Berenson1 9 noted that it had taken until the end of April for the CDC to respond to a report from January, which indicates the data you understand on VAERS does not wonder the real, real-time number of adverse events being reported.
This is important to know, since the system’s primary goal is to “detect new, extraordinary or rare vaccine adverse events” as a highway to monitor safety of inoculations. A backlog by months indicates that, quite possibly, there are so many reports coming in that that the CDC can’t to be dealt with.
Rare but serious side effects may be resulting but we just can’t visualize the trend because the data isn’t demonstrate, and the longer the backlog, the more people will be exposed to a potentially dangerous vaccine.
Why Are Thousands of Deaths Ignored?
In an interrogation with columnist Alex Newman( video above ), Dr. Peter McCullough stated he accepts the government’s response to the pandemic has resulted in tens of thousands of useless fatalities, and the mass vaccination planned is now causing thousands of others and they’re just letting it happen.
He’s astounded at the government’s nonexistent response to the thousands of deaths previously logged into VAERS , noting that the 1976 swine flu pandemic mass vaccination program was gathered after exactly 25 fatalities and a few cases hundred cases of paralysis. Drugs are also pulled from world markets at around 50 unexplained deaths.
On average, there was still 20 to 30 deaths reported following the seasonal flu vaccine, which is given to about 195 million Americans every year. 20 Compare that to the COVID-1 9 vaccines. At 95 million vaccinations administered, the extinction weigh is already at 3,542, the highest for any vaccine in autobiography. The compare in response is “alarming, ” McCullough says.
Even more concerning, after discussing 1,600 of these deaths, the FDA swore not a single extinction was related to the vaccine. McCullough doesn’t believe it, because he knows from first-hand experience it would take months to investigate that many fatalities.
“It is impossible for unnamed regulatory doctors without any event with COVID 19 to opine that none of the deaths were related to the vaccine, ” he says. “We’re sitting on, right now, the biggest number of vaccine fatalities, there’s been tens of thousands of hospitalizations, all attributable to the vaccine, and going strong …
In my professional ruling, the safest vaccine on world markets was the J& J vaccine. And that was attracted for very rare blood-clotting affairs. We had seven million people inoculated but the estimates are for the other two vaccines accessible[ Pfizer and Moderna ], the blood-clotting rates are probably 30 times that of J& J, and these others are going strong.”
Active Vaccine Surveillance Months Away From Implementation
The FDA has also have recognized that an examination of inoculation refuge data will be delayed for weeks, if not months, due to the pandemic hitting right as they were transitioning away from its Post-Licensure Rapid Immunization Safety Monitoring( PRISM) system, which was be applicable to road side effects from the pandemic H1N1 vaccine, into a brand-new method called the Biologics Effectiveness and Safety System( BEST ).
Using a patchwork of passive reporting arrangements rather than one comprehensive, active and central one, may eventually prove fateful. As reported by Kaiser Health News: 21
“Potentially risky, unanticipated actions to inoculations may not be so obvious in VAERS, a structure that is believed to miss many potential side effects — or in the nation’s additional monitoring systems, includes the Vaccine Safety Datalink and the CDC’s brand-new phone-based tracking program, v-safe.
‘It’s quite a hodgepodge of different systems of collecting data, ’ said Dr. Katherine Yih, a biologist and epidemiologist who specializes in vaccine surveillance at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care …
The Vaccine Safety Datalink, though highly regarded, did not include fairly vaccinations within its data from nine hospital methods treating 12 million people to catch the J& J issue, CDC officials said.
And enrollment in v-safe has been less than expected, with about 6 million people enrolled by the end of March, merely 6.4% of those who had been injected at that point.
That means that, at a time when about 100 million Americans were completely inoculated against COVID-1 9, the U.S. continues to rely on a patchwork system of vaccine monitoring systems that may fail to monitor a large enough swath of the population, professionals told KHN …
PRISM, which was repurposed for pharmaceutical safe … has not been used to track vaccine reactions during the COVID-1 9 pandemic, said[ onetime lead of vaccine refuge at the National Vaccine Program Office, Daniel] Salmon, who manage safe observing for the H1N1 vaccine.’ With PRISM, we measured it in a crisis and it controlled for a decade … I was truly surprised when it wasn’t used for COVID-1 9. That was why we improved it’ …
FDA officials said PRISM’s capabilities have been incorporated into BEST, which can examine data from 100 million people. Professionals told KHN that it has not been used extensively to monitor post-vaccination effects, but[ FDA representative Abby] Capobianco said:’ We dissent. BEST is built as a state-of-the-art active surveillance system’ …
The concern is that officials have leaned heavily on VAERS, a’ passive’ system that relies on reports from patients and health care providers to flag editions after vaccination that may or may not be related to the shots. A robust’ active’ surveillance system can examine large volumes of patient care records to equate rates of adverse events in people who received vaccines with those who didn’t.”
CDC Ignores Reports of Serious Adverse Effects
Getting back to the CDC, it has also decided it will no longer monitor all reported inoculation breakthrough contingencies( perhaps because they’re overloaded with reports of side impacts ?) and will exclusively probe vaccine breakthrough infections that result in hospitalization or extinction. 22
Recent complaints from medical professionals raise questions about the CDC’s ability to do even that one of the purposes of the number of jobs.
As reported by Review Journal, 23,24 the medical crew that treated an 18 -year-old girl declared for blood clots in the psyche, low-pitched platelet weigh and other indicates of a uncommon blood clotting disease shortly after receiving Johnson& Johnson’s COVID-1 9 injection, “urgently attempted guidance” from the CDC, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Johnson& Johnson for ideas on how to best treat their young patient.
Their inquiries and requests for help were discounted all over. The FDA “basically hung up on me, ” Dr. Brian Lipman told Review Journal, contributing, “We mostly got no help from anyone.” It took more than a week before the CDC even got around to calling back. That’s just what you’d expect from the world’s most preeminent infectious disease experts when you’re dealing with an dreadfully life-threatening case.
Rules for COVID-1 9 Death Reporting Changes Again
Signs that other countries are likewise starting to influence data in ways that will minimize vaccine failure frequencies can be seen in the U.K.’s decision to drop its rule that anyone having tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 within 28 epoches of dying are to be counted as a COVID-1 9 death.
Now that vaccines are out, COVID-1 9 is only to be rolled as the cause of death if the patient actually died as a result of an active event of COVID-1 9 and nothing else. The hypocrisy is nothing if not predictable at this degree. As reported by iNews: 25
“The daily tally of coronavirus deaths within 28 dates of a positive experiment is likely to be fell after scientific consultants alerted the Government it will become an increasingly incorrect measure of the pandemic and vaccine success.
The modelling sub-group of the Government’s scientific advisory committee Sage says that the 28 -day definition was useful before widespread vaccination, because deaths in hospital within a month of a positive exam were most probably due to COVID-1 9.
However now that tens of millions of the UK population have received their punches, extinctions from other causes could still show up in the daily data if they have previously tested positive for coronavirus.
A major Sage source said:’ If the clarity remain the same, these people would be counted as’ inoculation failures’, whereas the vaccine foreclosed demise from COVID, but they really died from something else.’”
Compensation for COVID-1 9 Vaccine Injury Is Limited
In closing, it’s also worth remembering that all who are injured by the COVID-1 9 “vaccines” are left to fend for themselves financially.
Not exclusively did they voluntary to be guinea pigs for an experimental gene regiman — which is what you’re doing if you get these “vaccines” now, as the studies are nearly two years out from being completed and the injections only have disaster call approval — they’re likewise financially responsible for any and all medical attention they might need as a reaction of their generosity.
If you decide to participate in this experimentation and are injured, you can try to apply for compensation from the Countermeasure Injury Compensation Act( CICP ), under which COVID-1 9 “vaccines” are a shielded countermeasure. 26
You cannot apply for and will not receive compensation from the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program( VICP ), which covers other vaccines, including the flu vaccine. You too cannot indict the vaccine creator, the authorities concerned, medical doctors or anybody else involved in the manufacturing, giving or administering of COVID-1 9 vaccines, as the government has special liability protections under the PREP Act.
However, be aware that compensation from CICP is very limited, and only applies in cases of serious hurt necessary hospitalization and developing in significant disability and/ or death. And, even though they are you assemble the eligibility criteria, it requires you to use up your private health insurance before it knocks in to pay the difference.
You must also file a request for benefits within one year of the year the vaccine was administered, and it is your responsibility to prove your gash was the “direct result of the countermeasure’s administration based on compelling, reliable, valid, medical and technical ground beyond mere temporal association. In other paroles, you have to prove what the inoculation make has yet to ascertain, examining how you are part of their still-ongoing study. Good luck.
Additional items and hyperlinks to benefit request forms can be found in the Congressional Research Service’s law sidebar, “Compensation Programs for Potential COVID-1 9 Vaccine Injuries.”2 7
Read more: articles.mercola.com