As noted by Dr. Ron Paul in the January 10, 2022, Liberty Report above, U.S. the administration is unexpectedly started to change their carol with regard to COVID and the COVID shots.

“The opposition to our position are starting to wake up, ” Paul says, as some shreds of truth are actually starting to be acknowledged. The good bulletin, Paul says, is that “Maybe some of the things they’ve been saying are not quite accurate, and maybe what we’ve been saying is closer to the truth, and maybe they’re starting to recognize that.”

CDC Director Now Calls for Focused Protection

Indeed, in recent dates, the U.S. Core for Disease Control and Prevention has made a remarkable number of U-turns, fully turning track on various narrative points.

For example, in a January 10, 2022, CNN interview, CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky actually admitted that “what[ the COVID shots] can’t do anymore is thwarted transfer, ”1 whereas before, the narrative was that if you get the jab, you have nothing to worry about anymore. In July 2021, President Biden promised that if you get vaccinated, “you’re not going to see get COVID.”2 Well, it wasn’t true-life. Numerous knew that, but were censored when placing it out.

A day earlier, January 9, Walensky too is sending out a tweet saying “We must protect people with comorbidities from severe COVID-1 9, ” which is what tens of thousands of physicians have been calling for since the creation of The Great Barrington Declaration in early October 2020. It used to call focused protection of high-risk men, such as the elderly, rather than blanket lockdowns.

It was recently revealed that Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Academy of Allergy and Infectious Diseases( NIAID) and his former boss , now retired National Academy of Health( NIH) administrator Francis Collins, colluded behind the scenes to squelch the declaration. 3 For whatever reason, Fauci and Collins were hell-bent on pushing economy-destroying lockdowns instead. In an October 8, 2020, email to Fauci, Collins wrote: 4,5, 6,7

“The proposal from the three fringe epidemiologists who met with the Secretary seems to be getting a lot of attention … There needs to be a quick and devastate published take down of its propositions … ”

“Don’t worry, I came this, ” Fauci replied. Later, Fauci sent Collins links to newly published articles refuting the focused shelter mixture, including an op-ed in Wired magazine, and an section in The Nation, entitled “Focused Protection, Herd Immunity and Other Deadly Delusions.”

CDC Follows Political Strategy, Not Science

Now, all of a sudden, Walensky is onboard with the “deadly delusion” of focused care. Her about-face would be confusing were it not for the fact that COVID countermeasures were never about protecting the public from a virus. From the beginning, the pandemic had political goals, and it still does.

The pressure is now on to prove the Biden administration has made some sort of progress with the pandemic. Biden made a lot of promises , none of which have come to fruition, so now the political constitution is scrounging to come up with some program that can induce them ogle as though they’re getting somewhere.

The problem is that cases are now exploding, when a successful vaccine campaign should have brought the situation under control. So, they now need a style to minimize the number of cases, whereas before, they used every quirk in the book to overcount them, 8 in order to better to scare people into complying with COVID regulations and going the jab.

New Testing Guidance Aims to Lower Case Frequency

One simple way to cut down subjects is to limit testing, and that’s another U-turn we’re now realizing. The CDC is now saying you should not retest formerly you’ve recovered from COVID. If you measure positive, really quarantine for five days and don’t retest to confirm that you’re negative, as the PCR can provide false positives for up to 12 weeks after the illnes has been resolved.

Well, we’ve known this for nearly two years once. From the start, professionals warned that the PCR cannot be used to diagnose an active infection, as it can pick up RNA from dead , noninfectious viral debris.

Health arbiters are now revolving the fib that these revises in lead are because we have two years’ worth of data, and they’re simply following the science. But that’s pure baloney, watching how the data never supported their COVID controls in the first place.

The CDC’s decision to revise quarantine guidelines down from 10 days to only five days likewise sounds politically motivated. Tallies register the economy is a primary concern of voting Americans right now, so they need to strike a balance between the desired demolition of the economy and keeping parties at work — at least until the 2022 polls are over.

There seems to be a LOT of sudden momentum surging in future directions of pointing the pandemic. If I’m right, we’re going to see even more of this, and pretty quickly, since Biden has to wrap it up in time to declare victory on March 1.~ Jeff Childers

In short, I believe most if not all of the recent changes in COVID guidance is to build a narrative that the Biden administration has successfully fetched the pandemic under control and reestablished a working economy. The change in narrative is based on political strategy , not science.

CDC Highlights Role of Comorbidities in Vaxxed COVID Deaths

rochelle walensky

>>>>> Click now <<<<<

As noted by Paul in the Liberty Report above, Walensky recently stated that 75% of COVID deaths had four or more comorbidities, “So, actually, these are people who were unwell to begin with.” The admittance departed viral and was cited as proof that COVID is a lethal risk for none but the sickest among us.

The CDC quickly stepped in, clarifying that she wanted “7 5% of COVID deaths among those who have received the COVID jab, ” not COVID extinctions overall. 9 You can see the unedited segment above, where that context is made clear. Still, we know that COVID constitutes very little risk for healthy unvaccinated parties as well, and that comorbidities are a primary risk factor regardless of your COVID jab status.

COVID Death Risk Has Always Been Low — Vaxxed or Not

For example, a 2020 study1 0 experienced 88% of hospitalized COVID patients in New York City had two or more comorbidities, 6.3% had one underlying health precondition and 6.1% had none.

In late August 2020, the CDC published data establishing merely 6% of the total death count had COVID-1 9 rostered as the sole cause of death. The remaining 94% had had an average of 2.6 comorbidities or preexisting health conditions that contributed to their demises. 11 So, yes, COVID is a lethal risk merely for the sickest among us, just as Walensky said, but that’s true whether you’re “vaccinated” or not.

As for the study1 2 Walensky discussed in that “Good Morning America” segment, it found that of the 1.2 million COVID jabbed topics, exclusively 0.0033% died of COVID between December 2020 and October 2021.( And of those, 77.8% had four or more comorbidities .) This study, Walensky claims as evidence that the COVID shot labours wonders to reduce the risk of death.

But does it certainly? Recall studies1 3 showing the noninstitutionalized illnes fatality rate is on average really 0.26% initiated with, and people under the age of 40 has actually a 0.01% jeopardy of dying from COVID. 14

When we’re talking about a fraction of a percentage point risk, we’re talking about a risk that is close to statistical zero. So, does lowering the health risks of demise from 0.01% to 0.003% truly translate into something worthwhile? And, most importantly, is that reduction worth the risks involved with taking the jab?

Clearly, it’s not a risk-free decision. OneAmerica, their own nationals reciprocal life insurance company, recently warned that all-cause deaths among working age Americans( 18 to 64) are up 40% over prepandemic criteria, 15 and they cannot be attributed to COVID.

So, what’s causing these extinctions? What potentially deadly thing did hundreds of millions of Americans do in 2021 that they’ve never done before? I’ll let you ponder whether Walensky’s claim that the COVID jab is saving lives is an accurate one.

CDC Admits Large Portion of’ COVID Patients’ Aren’t

In another recent media impression, Walensky stated that: 16

“In some hospitals that we’ve talked to, up to 40% of the patients who are coming in with COVID-1 9 are coming in not because they’re sick with COVID, but because they’re coming in with something else and have had … COVID or the Omicron variant detected.”

This, again, is something that we’ve been spotlighting since the start of the pandemic. Most so-called “COVID patients” simply weren’t, and still aren’t. They’re hospitalized for something else solely, and time happen to get a positive experiment ensue upon admission — which very possibly is a false positive. Either way, voila, they’re a COVID patient, even though they’re hospitalized for a broken leg or a heart attack.

As noted by Delta News TV, “Comments like these have given doubt on the severity of the current COVID surge even as the State supreme court considers legal challenges to Biden’s sweeping private sector mandates on that terribly issue.”1 7

Is the Political Pandemic in Its Final Death Throes?

In a January 10, 2022, blog upright, 18 Jeff Childers, an attorney, and the president and founder of Childers Law firm, presents a hypothesis for why we might be looking at the end of the pandemic, as the Biden administration has “no reasonable alternative but to wrap this whole thing up in the next 60 daylights or so.”

“There’s an interesting political dynamic form up, a kind of political weaknes traction that might just be driving federal COVID policy toward purity and an objective to the pandemic … a lot of reality has been bursting through lately, ” Childers writes. 19

He points out how a federal adjudicate recently sought the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to handout all the Pfizer COVID jab data that the agency craved 75 years to liberate. The volume of that data is now due March 1, 2022, the working day of Biden’s State of the Union address. Childers suspects the Pfizer documents will contain plenty of counternarrative fodder and politically flustering details.

Why We’re Seeing a U-Turn in the Narrative Now

Biden needs some good word by his State of the Union address, as it’ll be his last chance to “help move the needle back toward blue-blooded, ” and the space he can do that is by declaring the pandemic over. He can then claim to be the great liberator who terminated the pandemic measures for good.

“If they handle this right, they can give their voting base and sycophantic media negotiators all the necessary talking points to boost Dem potentials for the midterm polls, ” Childers writes. 20

But to draw away that U-turn with any semblance of credibility, they have to start cutting the occurrence pace now, and that’s precisely what we’re meet. For example, the CDC recently changed its guidelines so you don’t was also necessary retest after you’ve recovered from COVID, so no more false positives from recovered people.

Florida’s official policy is now to only test high-risk individuals and those who are symptomatic. Childers points out that the left-leaning Sun Sentinel even operated an article foreground the facts of the case that despite surging speciman paces, Florida has the lowest COVID death rate in the person, second only to the sparsely populated Alaska. “What unbelievably potent oblige could acquire the Sun Sentinel downplay the pandemic like this? ” he asks.

Will We Finally Get a More Accurate Death Count?

The CDC likewise emerges poised to change the definition of COVID death to what it should have been all along. Childers memoes 😛 TAGEND

“Fox News … Bret Baier … invited[ Walensky]’ how many of the 836,000 deaths in the U.S. linked to COVID are FROM COVID or how many are WITH COVID? ’

Director Walensky said …’ those data will be forthcoming.’ Until about 10 minutes ago, the CDC said it didn’t HAVE any route to track that kind of information … But now, apparently, CDC plans to release informed about deaths from and with. What do you want to bet they’ll be REDUCING total COVID deaths shortly? By a lot.”

They’re likewise starting to accurately count only those who are actually sick with COVID rather than including beings hospitalized for other reasons who just happen to test positive.

“Yesterday, New York Governor Hochul announced that virtually HALF of cases are hospitalized for’ non-COVID grounds, ’ scattering the decompose corpse of the Narrative.

You might recall that only last week she infirmaries to start breaking down the reported fleshes and showing how many folks ACTUALLY are sick with COVID versus merely measuring positive in research hospitals. We’ve been bawling about overcounting hospitalizations for two years now and they are only noticed? ”2 1

Same Narrative Switch Seen in Europe

The same rapid substitution in narrative can be seen in Europe. Childers continues: 22

“Yesterday, the Guardian UK ran a floor headlined,’ End mass punches and live with COVID, says ex-head of vaccine taskforce.’ It says Dr. Clive Dix — onetime chairman of the UK’s vaccine taskforce — has called for a’ major rethink’ of the UK’s COVID strategy, in effect reversing the approach of the past two years and returning to a’ brand-new normality.’

Shocking the cores the oft-maligned authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, Dr. Dix — without getting cancelled — said this 😛 TAGEND

‘We need to analyze whether we use the current booster campaign to ensure the vulnerable are protected, if this is seen was essential … Mass population-based vaccination in the UK should now end.’ Pointing mass vaccinations? Suddenly that idea is okay to discuss in the corporate media? Wow.”

In a January 3, 2022, interview with the Daily Telegraph, prof Andrew Pollard, head of the U.K.’s Committee on Vaccination and Immunization who helped create the Oxford-AstraZeneca shot, also made a previously verboten statement: “We can’t vaccinate the planet every four or six months, ” he said. “It’s not sustainable or affordable.”2 3 And, like Dix, Pollard was not canceled, censored or deplatformed.

January 11, 2022, Bloomberg too reported that “European Union regulators warned that frequent COVID-1 9 booster shot could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible. Repeat booster doses every four months could eventually weaken the immune response and tire out beings, according to the European Medicines Agency.”2 4

Marco Cavaleri, the EMA’s head of vaccines policy, said during a January 11, 2022, press brief: 25

“While use of added boosters can be part of contingency plans, recited vaccinations within short lulls would not represent a sustainable long-term strategy.[ Boosters] can be done once, or perhaps twice, but it’s not something that we can think should be repeated constantly. We need to think about how we can transition from the current pandemic direct to a more rife setting.”

That same day, the World Health Organization’s Technical Advisory Group on COVID-1 9 Vaccine Composition( TAG-CO-VAC) also issued a statement2 6 saying that “a vaccination strategy based on reproduced recall dose of the original inoculation form is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable.”

They likewise stated that COVID inoculations that actually prevent infection and transmission need to be developed. The timing of all these statements is nothing if not remarkable. It indicates just how coordinated this plandemic narrative is, all around the world.

Justice Sotomayor Called Out

Perhaps the best example that the narrative is undergoing a radical modernise, Childers says, is Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor being knowledge checked and called out as a storyteller by The Washington Post 😛 TAGEND

“You’ll recall that Sotomayor confidently told the lawyers during oral argument Friday that’ 100,000 ’ children are available on critical care and on ventilators with Omicron. The solicitors didn’t challenge her even though there aren’t that countless total ICU bunks in the whole country.

But on Saturday — the next day! — the Washington Post feed an section headlined,’ Sotomayor’s false claim that’ over 100,000 ’ children are in’ serious condition’ with COVID.’ FALSE CLAIM ?? What ?? Here’s how the fact-checking article ended 😛 TAGEND

‘It’s important for State supreme court rights to do rules based on correct data … But Sotomayor during an oral disagreement offered a digit — 100,000 children in’ serious statu … numerous on ventilators’ — that is absurdly high. She pays Four Pinocchios.’ It might be unprecedented for a major radical newspaper to call out a liberal Justice. What could be going on? …

There seems to be a LOT of rapid momentum tiding in future directions of discontinuing the pandemic. If I’m right, we’re going to see even more of this, and pretty quickly, since Biden has to wrap it up in time to declare victory on March 1. Which would explain why they propagandized the SOTU back a month. They need the time to get the pandemic wrapped up.”2 7

Read more: