It’s never been easier to pick up a smartphone that takes immense portraits. There are plenty of handsets that proposal very good cameras both on paper and out in the real world. But deciding which is the very best is a little trickier. For that, you need a big batch of samples for an in-depth camera shootout.
For today’s best-of-the-best shootout we have the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, OnePlus 9 Pro, Samsung Galaxy S2 1 Ultra, and Sony Xperia 1 III. While there are other great candidates out there beyond this quartet, these devices rank highly among the best camera phones of 2021 still further. We’ve invested the latest updates on each model got to make sure we’re getting “the worlds largest” up-to-date camera experience.
Let’s prance right in and look which phone comes out on top. If you want to take a closer look at the snaps themselves, you’ll find them in this Google Drive folder.
See also: The best Android phones you can buy
Camera likenes specs
Apple iPhone 12 Pro MaxOnePlus 9 ProSamsung Galaxy S2 1 UltraSony Xperia 1 III
Main1 2MP f/1.6 aperture 1.7um pixels IBIS, Dual Pixel PDAF4 8MP f/1.8 gap 1.22um pixels, 1/1.43 ” sensor OIS, Omnidirectional PDAF1 08 MP f/1.8 aperture 0.8um pixels 1/1.33″ sensor OIS, PDAF1 2MP f/1.7 gap 1.8um pixels 1/1.7″ sensor OIS, Dual Pixel PDAF
Wide angle1 2MP f/2.4 hole 1/3.6” sensor5 0MP f/2.2 opening 1.0um pixels 1/1.56″ sensor AF12MP f/2.2 gap 1.4um pixels 1/2.55” sensor Dual Pixel PDAF1 2MP f/2.2 opening 1/2.6″ sensor Dual Pixel PDAF
Zoom2. 5x visual zoom 12MP f/ 2.2 aperture 1.0um pixels 1/3.4” sensor OIS, PDAF3. 3x optical zoom 8MP f/ 2.4 aperture 1.0um pixels OIS, PDAF3x optical zoom 10MP f/ 2.4 aperture 1.22um pixels 1/3.24” sensor OIS, Dual Pixel PDAF2. 9x/ 4.4 x optical zoom 12MP f/ 2.3/ f/ 2.8 aperture 1/2.9″ sensor OIS, Dual Pixel PDAF
4th lensMonochrome 2MP f/ 2.4 aperture1 0x optical zoom 10MP f/ 4.9 aperture 1.22um pixels 1/3.24″ sensor OIS, Dual Pixel PDAF
AF3D Time-of-Flight LiDARLaser autofocusLaser autofocus0. 3MP 3D Time-of-Flight
Selfie1 2MP f/2.2 gap 1/3.6″ sensor16MP f/ 2.5 aperture 1.0um pixels 1/3.06″ sensor40MP f/ 2.2 hole 0.7um pixels 1/2.8” sensor PDAF8MP f/ 2.0 aperture 1.12um pixels 1/4″ sensor
There’s a wide variety of sensor and lens configurations across these smartphones but all proposal the essentially standard ultra-wide, main, and zoom setup. Interestingly, the iPhone 12 Pro Max and Xperia 1 III offer the smallest main and ultra-wide sensors which, in theory, should present inferior dynamic wander and detail captivate, particularly in tougher lighting circumstances. OnePlus and Samsung likewise fill pixel-binning technology in their cameras, so their main cameras actually output 12 MP personas just like the other two phones but benefit from more portrait data. OnePlus likewise employs this technique for its ultra-wide camera, which too happens to be the largest sensor found in all these ultra-wide cameras by quite a margin.
But perhaps the more interesting lens out of all these telephones is the Sony Xperia 1 III’s dual focal length periscope zoom camera. Unlike Samsung which exploits two separate cameras, Sony offers two visual zoom levels( 2.9 x and 4.4 x) from a single sensor, thanks to mechanical moving sides. This outcomes in two different focal sections and apertures, somewhat like a true-life optical zoom lens from a DSLR camera. Still, Samsung offers the longest range optical zoom out of the knot due to its 10 x periscope camera.
It’s also worth mentioning that the OnePlus 9 Pro is the slightly more economical alternative now, it is therefore will be interesting to see how well this phone performs.
Without further ado, let’s dive into some pictures.
The above shots have an easy to identify white point, enabling all four cameras to recreate the situations with most accurate dyes. There’s no self-evident oversaturation or outrageou pigment color to be seen here and all four do a good job. Being picky, we can see that the iPhone 12 Pro Max targets a slightly higher showing and tints its parks slightly more towards the yellows in both word-paintings. It’s a bit improbable but gazes livelier. The Sony Xperia 1 III is the most tamed of the four in the roadside picture, with a weary epitome and toned-down highlights that are the truest to life but arguably a little dull. The OnePlus 9 and Galaxy S2 1 Ultra sit somewhere in-between, erring on the two sides of pragmatism with a little extra pop. The OnePlus 9 Pro’s sky tone is also somewhat off due to a somewhat violet tint.
Photography expressions justified: ISO, gap, shutter moved, and more
The lizard figurine doesn’t have an obvious lily-white site and so we see the phones perform quite differently. Apple and Sony nail much more realistic pigments. Again, the iPhone colors its dark-greens a little towards yellow but is otherwise the best of the group for tonal accuracy. OnePlus and Samsung struggle with the abundance of parks, oversaturating their idols as a result. They’re still OK envisions but this demonstrates our earlier assumption that these two telephones are the most likely to apply heavier color processing to their images.
Our final shot of the field showcases a more neutral coloring pallet for Samsung and Sony, somewhat warmer for Apple, and the heaviest dose of saturation applied by OnePlus.
Color ranking 😛 TAGEND
Sony Xperia 1 III: Accurate shades that are incredibly true to life. White balance comprises up well in trickier shots. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra: Accurate complexions that give a little extra pop without devastating the realism. White balance isn’t always perfect. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max: Generally very precise emblazons and lily-white counterbalance but requests a warm yellow-bellied color and added revelation to all of its drawings. OnePlus 9 Pro: Predominantly very good colors but can be caught out with ponderous saturation from time to time.
Our next cause of shots looks at how these phones captivate detail in strong dawn. Remember, each of these telephones yields 12 MP portraits and such is 100% crops.
As you’d expect from flagship smartphones sporting some of the best image sensors around, items ogle very good in shining sunrise. The Sony Xperia 1 III is the softest of the four. That’s not solely a bad thing if you’re after the most natural look but it does look the quirky smudge in darker angles. OnePlus and Samsung have the sharpest-looking illustrates. The iPhone 12 Pro Max also offers a very detailed image although you can see a fraction less detail in the dirt in the bottom left of the frame.
We see some more obvious gaps with slightly less ideal illuminating. Again, Sony handwritings in a realistic presentation that’s free from the likenes clean-up and sharpening that we so often realize with smartphones. The iPhone 12 Pro Max likewise aims for realistic items but is a little blurrier due to the little ideal lighting. Likewise with the OnePlus 9 Pro, but the phone touches the portrait up with some denoise and sharpening. Samsung too strokes up its idol for the very best, ensuring that the lamb’s wool shows sharp-worded and focused despite the low-pitched ignite. It’s marginally the best of the bunch, but there’s not a whole lot in it.
You won’t be left wanting for coloring or detail with any of these high-end smartphone cameras.
Detail ranking( virtually a suck ):
Samsung Galaxy S2 1 Ultra: Very good in daylight and supports up equally well in less ideal cases. OnePlus 9 Pro: See above. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max: Solid items in daylight but a little bit more noise in lower light. Sony Xperia 1 III: Slight smudging in some palls but generally good details overall.
The above place is a tricky HDR shot where the camera has to balance colors speculative foregrounds with the tree shadows and pigments. The iPhone is clearly the weakest of the bunch here, with obvious clipping on the left of the portrait and on the ground. The darks and complexions are likewise washed out. The Sony Xperia 1 III bazaars better, removing the greens and sky blue-blooded on the left side and evading excerpt the grease foregrounds. It’s pretty close to how your heart examines the scene.
Related: What is HDR in photography ?
OnePlus and Samsung volunteer the stronger HDR tech, obtaining more coloring reach from the tree shadows and grime line. However, the OnePlus 9 Pro oversaturates the light-green tree canopy and the image is a fraction overexposed held it was taken in the darks. Samsung’s implementation strikes the best highlight and darknes poise, but the soil is a little too warm and it misses the sky blues that Sony’s idol resolves correctly.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max again fairs the worst in our second depict. The phone over-pumps the grass more offers too small a dynamic scope to capture much foreground emblazon on the tree leaves and stalk. OnePlus does a much better job extracting coloring and item from the darks but oversaturates the scene’s hues to an even greater extent. The sky too gapes a little purple and is verging on overexposed.
Apple’s HDR technology is miles behind its Android rivals.
Sony is better than these two overall. Like the iPhone, the HDR technology doesn’t extract too much detail from the palls — but at least it does a better errand on the foliages, and overall pigments are again the most realistic. This leaves the Samsung Galaxy S2 1 Ultra sitting somewhere in between OnePlus and Sony, striking a reasonable poise between dark and highlight exposure — but again there’s a little oversaturation involved. Take your picking between Samsung and Sony for the best picture now, and that’s saying something, as they both suffer from lens flare.
We close out our focus on HDR with this red letterbox and Android figurine. The develops establish our earlier analysis. Apple again spouts a little too much color into the letterbox shot. The phone completely fails to extract any of the sky complexion or detail in the second picture. Sony’s HDR implementation is better now, render decent dynamic straddle and colors, but both visualizes are too dark.
The OnePlus 9 Pro’s HDR technology is very powerful at removing darknes detail but leaves the letterbox photo extremely skewed towards the highlights. The figurine depict is better and very well-balanced. Likewise, Samsung directs these HDR drawings effortlessly, albeit with a insignificant foreground clip in the clouds behind the letterbox. But it’s the best presentation overall.
HDR rankings 😛 TAGEND
Samsung Galaxy S2 1 Ultra: Ability of the most significant dynamic stray while still offering a sensible pigment counterbalance. Not quite perfect but the most consistent. Sony Xperia 1 III: Surprisingly solid HDR with the best color balance of the four, but seldom fights to find the compensate show. OnePlus 9 Pro: The phone’s HDR technology is extremely powerful at straining the camera’s dynamic collection but overdoes it on the coloring saturation. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max: The iPhone fails our tougher HDR measures, struggling to extract items from darks or prevent highlight clipping. Pigments are generally good, but the absence of dynamic scope seldom induces washed-out visualizes.
Shooting in low-pitched light-colored
Low light photography separates the very best from the respite, Starting with dye, all four phones hold up very well with limited illuminate. The iPhone is again a little warm but adds solid exposure that’s better than OnePlus, although the 9 Pro offers a most natural, softer coming to detail, as we’ll assure more of in a minute.
The Samsung Galaxy S2 1 Ultra furnishes the best dynamic range of the bunch now. You can make out detail at the edges of the epitome and this is likely helped by the sheer size of its prime sensor. As before, Sony pokes to a softer presentation and the exposure is good given the size of its image sensor. But the colours are oversaturated, a rare flaw for the Xperia.
Cropping in on the details discloses Apple most aggressively sharpens up its low-spirited lighting idols. While this does help to extract background texture it also causes unsightly halos around hard lines and text. We can make out a bit of sharpening in Sony’s low-pitched light epitome cultivate extremely, but it’s not as extensive.
The bigger sensors of the OnePlus 9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S2 1 Ultra don’t need anywhere near as much clean-up in low-spirited light-headed and gaze more natural as a result, though it’s the OnePlus 9 Pro that retains a little extra detail and composition here.
You have to turn the flames down quite low before any of these phones struggle for exposure. Once we do that( see below ), the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max clearly strives to keep up with the race. The Xperia 1 III too contends with revelation and pigment symmetry in this very dim scenario. The massive sensors within the Samsung Galaxy S2 1 Ultra and OnePlus 9 Pro can captivate light even with the brightness right down low-spirited, which is quite impressive if you’re trying to shoot action that would otherwise require a longer exposure time. Although both these phones suffer from quite a lot of noise here, the OnePlus 9 Pro is marginally less loud and more efficient exposed.
Night mode can really help out when shooting with virtually no light like this. However, unlike its contestants, the Sony Xperia 1 III doesn’t offer a dedicated Night mode. Instead, the phone automatically increases its showing period, so you’ll need continuou sides. Even so, the phone doesn’t relatively maximize its potential. I represented around with the manual positions to try to showcase the upper compas of what Sony’s phone can do, provisioning “youve had” the equanimity and the know-how. As you can see, the phone is capable of capturing rational videos in low glowing, as long as you keep it continuous. However, the camera can’t capture the same level of dynamic array as telephones with multi-frame Night modes. On the plus area, the research results gape natural and soft compared to the heavy processing of its rivals.
Sony doesn’t have a dedicated light procedure but its powerful manual options can help.
The iPhone performs better with its long exposure Night mode enabled. There’s still a tier of particle and sharping throughout, but it’s a extremely respectable image given the circumstances. Samsung offers the best exposure and shades of the knot. Nonetheless even with Night mode enabled, there is a large amount of noise and blocky-ness present in the epitome, particularly in the darks. This glances to be from the use of an extremely high ISO level and/ or machine learning processing.
This leaves the OnePlus 9 Pro as the marginally better Night mode shooter. There’s some banding and the colourings aren’t fairly recognize on, but it suffers from less sound and artifacts than Samsung’s low light-colored camera while entrust in an otherwise particularly comparable result.
Low light ranks 😛 TAGEND
OnePlus 9 Pro: The big sensor is capable of taking good rapid illustrations while Nightscape is a powerful implement for artifact-free very low light-footed shooting. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra: Great low-toned illumination illustrations even without Night mode but uses a slightly heavier quantity of processing than our winner. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max: Powerful Night mode but its smaller persona sensor is weaker when aiming a fast move in low glowing. Sony Xperia 1 III: Despite coming in last, Sony’s telephone still takes reasonable low-grade dawn snaps. Without a dedicated Night mode, you have to wait for a long exposure that increases the risk of blur.
Telephoto and periscope zooms
Before diving into the quality of these zoom scenes, a document on colour and show. All four smartphones do a tolerable enterprise at applying very similar color processing to all of their cameras. As such, the idols generally coincide the rules of thumb for white poise, hue, etc ., that we’ve already highlighted.
That being said, the OnePlus has a small color and showing shifting when switching to telephoto and ultra-wide lenses. Sony’s Xperia 1 III too envisions some change in exposure when using the periscope cameras. Samsung and Apple are the most consistent here, but there’s really not much in it. The bigger change comes from the opennes and excellence of zoom on offer.
What’s clear from the first batch of zoom illustrates is that the Galaxy S2 1 Ultra is the endorse of flexibility, offering a big step back with the ultra-wide, albeit with some see perimeter distortion, and give the best quality long-range zoom at 10 x. The ultra-wide lens also has a noticeable dose of sharpening referred though, so the main camera is the best-looking shooter.
The phone’s 3x and 5x zoom samples aren’t as detailed as the 10 x periscope camera, displaying a more heavily processed seek, extremely next to the Sony Xperia 1 III’s softer, more natural-looking zoom visualizes. Sony’s 3x colour processing is a bit off and the 10 x shot is too shaky to be useful, but the phone’s give is otherwise consistent between shots.
The OnePlus 9 galas quite well out to 5x, although there’s a noticeable sharpening pass applied from the digital zoom and the sky has an too warm hue. The ultra-wide camera is incredibly detailed. The iPhone offers a similarly solid ultra-wide lens, but zoom aspect doesn’t hold out as well beyond 3x.
The S2 1 Ultra examines best at 1x and 10 x, while the Xperia 1 III is more consistent between 2x and 7x.
Due to the defined nature of smartphone lenses, focal segment changes a camera’s ability to focus on nearby themes for macro shots and the like — so you might not be able to use the best-looking camera for the shot you crave. See the precedents below, where the Xperia 1 III and Galaxy S2 1 Ultra periscope cameras are no good for macro shots.
The next gallery was captivated to fill the make rather than look at specific intervals, so we can see how the phones perform when paying no mind to the specific hardware’s optical zoom capabilities. In virtually all of these instances, the phones rely on digital zoom to at least some extent.
At close zoom status( 2x-3x ), all four phones hand in decent causes abusing either their telephoto or digital zooms. So you’re well handled, catering you can get close enough to your subject. Nonetheless, the approximately 4x shot showcases questions for the OnePlus, which can’t concentrates its telephoto camera at this length. Similarly, the Galaxy S2 1 Ultra’ s telephoto and periscope cameras materialize have no hope now; the shot looks just like a ugly upscale from the main camera.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max and Xperia 1 III manage to focus their visual zoom cameras on the subject, creating good-looking outcomes even though they’re using some digital upscaling as well. This goes to show that long-range prowess doesn’t be transformed into stellar zoom abilities for every shot.
The telescope lens moving-picture show a similar limited for Apple’s phone when the telephoto camera doesn’t lock, although the 7x shot of the tied doll impounds up considerably better. Likewise, the OnePlus fairs better when its telephoto engages for the first pic, as does the Galaxy S2 1 Ultra, although the 9 Pro falls behind the iPhone at longer assortments in lower lighting.
The Samsung Galaxy S2 1 Ultra’ s latter paintings look OK thanks to its hybrid zoom technology, although they’re not as crystal clear as visual zoom. Sony’s Xperia 1 III is the most consistent here thanks to its variable visual lens. It’s also the only phone that changes through focal span the vision and computes natural breadth of land. Nonetheless, the 7x develop is quite soft and Sony’s camera suffers from some HDR/ concentrate troubles, which you can read more about below.
Zoom ranks( seam winners ):
Sony Xperia 1 III: The variable focal portion periscope camera is brilliant for mid-level zoom but struggles at longer sections. Would be the very best setup if not for periscope HDR/ sharpen controversies. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra: Best long-range zoom by a mile. Hybrid zoom doesn’t ogle as good as optical around 5x. It doesn’t always ogle the very best but is reasonably consistent. OnePlus 9 Pro: 3.3 x visual working well for landscapes but doesn’t always focus for macro shots. Longer range snaps hold out marginally better than the iPhone and specify good-looking personas between 3.3 x and about 7x. Digital upscales below 3.3 x don’t are so beautiful. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max: While good at long range, the phone is very consistent below 4x. Some moves ogle better than adversaries that claim longer-range abilities.
Closer look at ultra-wides
In periods of field-of-view, Apple’s iPhone 12 Pro Max and Samsung’s Galaxy S2 1 Ultra can fit the most in their shot. The trade-off is that these two telephones suffer some more observable bia at the edges of their chassis — still, there’s no arguing with a better quality of these photos in daylight. Sony’s ultra-wide lens is slightly narrower than OnePlus’ but an equally important difference is that the Xperia 1 III has a little more noise in the palls and a little less detail.
Taking the ultra-wide lens out in lower light-headed relents a much greater difference. Apple’s iPhone 12 Pro Max clearly contends for showing, ensuing in crushed pitch-blacks. While the colorings be realistic, they’re a little washed out. The OnePlus 9 Pro is similarly dark with underexposed palls, with an added heavy lift to saturation that seems inhuman, though this handset has fewer signeds of chromatic phenomenon( purple haloes) than its rivals.
All four ultra-wide cameras hand in mixed decisions in lower lighting.
Samsung’s epitome nurses up a little better with regards to the dynamic range, but the picture quality is notably worse in low-grade light-headed. The Xperia 1 III’s long revelation kicked in due to the low-spirited dawn. This arises in the brightest revelation and vivid dyes but comes at the risk of shake and blur. Clearly, all four ultra-wide cameras strife much more with dim, overcast lighting.
Taking a closer look at the details in daylight, it’s clear that the Galaxy S2 1 Ultra and iPhone 12 Pro Max aren’t flawless, particularly on complex qualities like trees. There’s a heavier dosage of sharping to cleaning process the idols, most notably in Samsung’s image. The other two are very tough to tell apart, but the OnePlus perhaps appears a fraction cleanser. The Xperia 1 III is just a fraction noisier in the darkness and there are a few ratifies of sharpening along the tree peripheries. But both of these telephones retain sharper items than Apple and Samsung, owing in part to their narrower field of view.
Ultra-wide rankings( too mingled to pick ):
iPhone 12 Pro Max: Very wide field of view with solid hues and details. Contends in lower light, dark darks, and has some lens aberration. OnePlus 9 Pro- Excellent color and detail in good illuminate. Minimal lens distortion. Over saturates and quashes our low-spirited lamp precedent. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra- Very wide field of view with acceptable aberration, although inspects more heavily processed than its antagonists. Passable in low-pitched glowing. Sony Xperia 1 III- Details are good and pigments realistic, but shadows are a little noisier than the contender. Long exposure is required for low-pitched daybreak, which is a double-edged sword.
Bokeh, sketch, and selfie
High-quality bokeh blur and good-looking likeness cure our smartphones bridge the gap with professional-grade DSLR moves. The outcomes for blur is somewhat desegregated now. The first precedent below showcases the limitation of Apple’s approach, with a sharp, on/ off application of blur that foliages half my sandwich in the foreground and half in the back.
The other handsets fair better at rectify foreground and background estrangement, however all three struggle with the edges of the glass bottles to some extent. Even the best in the business still struggle to achieve flawless edge detection, but overall the results are pretty good.
Fortunately, the phones perform much better with faces. The iPhone 12 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy S2 1 Ultra are the best now. But I’ll give the nod to Samsung for its slightly better hair detection and more realistic skin hues. The iPhone is too orange here.
The OnePlus 9 Pro under-exposes the subject and the skin tone is again too warm. Sony’s Xperia 1 III does a decent position with scalp textures, but the background is completely over-exposed. This is a consistent problem when attempting to snap portraits with a colors background exercising the phone’s bokeh mode. You’ll come much better causes leaving bokeh off.
The Xperia 1 III has same issues with its front-facing camera. You have to use a separate Portrait Selfie mode to use bokeh on the front camera and the results are very poor. Edge detection simply doesn’t work well enough to induce the idols useable. The selfie camera paucity the dynamic range of its opponents too.
The other three cameras are much more similar when shooting biography selfies. Edge detection is generally OK although a bit rough around fuzz peripheries. HDR and the level of detail are excellent from all three, though OnePlus and Samsung present slightly more realistic skin tones here.
Portrait standings 😛 TAGEND
Samsung Galaxy S2 1 Ultra: Solid edge detection for objectives and faces with good scalp ambiances on the front and rear camera. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max: So-so edge detection but better with faces. Skin ambiances are a fraction too warm. OnePlus 9 Pro: Generally good hem perception although underexposed darker scalp. The selfie camera was good. Sony Xperia 1 III: Overexposes when shooting photographs with bokeh blur. The Portrait Selfie feature is particularly poor quality for a flagship phone.
The best camera phones of 2021 so far: The conclusion
Credit: Robert Triggs/ Android Authority
Clearly, all four flagship smartphones make some excellent drawings, as you’d hope at this cost. To keep this short I’ll name the Samsung Galaxy S2 1 Ultra as the marginal winner. Not because it makes vastly superior envisions over its rivals, but because it doesn’t have any major fatigues. The phone consistently graded in the top two for every category, obliging it the best all-around shooter of the assortment. The phone makes immense selfies, descriptions, low lighter, and wide-angle envisions. It also offers the longest range zoom, although perhaps its biggest weakness is mid to long-range shots around 5x.
Samsung’s Galaxy S2 1 Ultra doesn’t have any self-evident penchants, becoming it the very best all-around.
Apple’s iPhone 12 Pro Max presents an incredibly consistent camera bundle, peculiarly when it comes to color accuracy. However, the handset’s long-range zoom, HDR, and low sunlight capabilities are a little dated and don’t fairly keep working with the best that Android has to offer. Despite its slightly lower price tag, the OnePlus 9 Pro is a very competitive shooter extremely, especially when it is necessary to low-grade daybreak and ultra-wide shooting. But its dye, HDR, and zoom abilities are a little inconsistent.
With all that said, Sony’s Xperia 1 III is actually my favorite telephone to shoot with, due to its colour accuracy and the savory degree of environment available from the dual focal duration periscope camera. Unfortunately, the phone’s selfie and low-toned light capabilities don’t pair the best in the business, seeing it hard to recommend to most consumers.
Which of these four smartphones do you think makes the best pictures? Cast your vote in the tally above and make us know in the comments.
iPhone 12 Pro Max
Buy it Now
OnePlus 9 Pro
Buy it Now
Samsung Galaxy S2 1 Ultra
Buy it Now
Sony Xperia 1 III
Buy it Now
Read more: androidauthority.com