This story is about how to talk to your conspiracy denialist friends about “nanobots in vaccines.” No truly, this story is about how to talk to your conspiracy denialist friends about “nanobots in vaccines”!
The Big Picture: From Authorization to the Internet of Organization
I’ve thought about this quite a bit, and here’s what I am thinking. The browbeat and the hoopla around the COVID injections is a prelude, designed to groom us for the notorious Fourth Industrial Revolution and the so announced “convergence of biological models with AI.”
But while special topics of “nanobots in COVID vaccines” is dirty to the ear of any honourable citizen — the plans for the Fourth Industrial Revolutions and convergence of biological lifetime with machines are documented in abundance on official authority websites and by reputable NGOs. So there is a chance to follow right in the strides of the holy COVID injection and break through!
The entire concept of the Fourth Industrial Revolution is predicated upon “nanobots in everything, ” which draws the topic of “nanobots in vaccines” a mere subset of special topics of “nanobots in everything.”
It also sees the current peasant concern about “nanobots in vaccines” a historical bump, a period during which the population goes used to thinking about nanotech in our figures in general — be it with peasant concern or with hearty laughter at the crazy plot theorists — before the “stakeholders” actually roll out “nanobots in everything” in daylight and make it a part of our reality.
Excuses are plentiful: pandemic surveillance, financial transactions, “fighting cancer and HIV” — or whatever else they come up with to justify the intrusion. There is no “theory” in that conspiracy theory, although they want us to think that there is no conspiracy.
It is important to remember that while different employments are possible, the main point of “nanotech of everything” is efficient asset management and surveillance. We are not all that valuable in a macrocosm that is considered overpopulated, so if their minuscule manoeuvres be brought to an end harming us — biologically, politically, or in terms of our liberations and our access to joy — it will be our question, just like today, vaccine trauma is the problem of the inoculation injured.
That’s a detail , not a speculation. And if it gets out of control, and this entire thing downfalls, then that’s what’s it’s going to be in due time, and we just don’t know it. But I remain hoping … I retain hoping that we can prevent it if more of us say no. The dream for the Fourth Industrial Revolution is so grand that its core mandate — as abusive and pornographic “where theyre” — are just the very first bite by the aspiring technocrats into our bodily and other sovereignties. They are just Step One, and there are hundreds of steps after that, unless we stand tall.
Are They Finally “Giving Us Our Freedoms Back”?
In the recent weeks, the script has seemingly flung, and even the most COVID-crazy politicians started talking about rolled back any limitations. It varied so abruptly that it virtually feels peculiar! But something about it is off. It’s insincere. They are doing it in such a wobbly course, without closing the door, while still leaving half the restrictions in place — that I am approximately sure that they’ll be back with some other clever meaning. After all, their most important goal at the moment is to invalidate free will — as under the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the peasants have none of it, and free will is a luxury!
The Internet of Organization Is Not a Conspiracy Theory
Without further ado, let’s look at the evidence. Let’s talk about the Internet of Figure at an financial program — which is something that we can, with some blessing, try to discuss with our conspiracy denialist friends without positioning off their “conspiracy theory” alarm. The Internet of Bodies( IoB) is a very serious project, supported by the world’s preceding politicians, the UN, various NGOs, corporations, and the military.
The Internet of Figure — a system of organizations, mechanically connected to the internet the direction our digital manoeuvres are connected today — is a foundational stone of the ambitious Fourth Industrial Revolution. Here is the definition of the Fourth Industrial Revolution — as per Klaus Schwab — on a very serious website, Encyclopedia Britannica 😛 TAGEND
“The Fourth Industrial Revolution acclaims a series of social, political, racial, and financial turbulences that will unfold over the 21 st century. Building on the widespread availability of digital technologies that were the result of the Third Industrial, or Digital, Revolution, the Fourth Industrial Revolution will be driven largely by the convergence of digital, biological, and physical innovations.”
“It’s important to appreciate that the Fourth Industrial Revolution involves a systemic change across many sectors and aspects of human life: the crosscutting impacts of emerging technologies are even more important than the exciting capabilities they represent.
Our ability to edit the building blocks of animation has recently been massively expanded by low-cost gene sequencing and techniques such as CRISPR; artificial intelligence is augmenting the procedures and talent in every industry; neurotechnology is procreating unprecedented strides in how we can use and influence the brain as the last frontier of human biology; automation is obstructing century-old transport and manufacturing paradigms; and technologies such as blockchain and smart textiles are redefining and blurring the boundary between the digital and physical worlds.”
“The result of all this is societal transformation at a global scale. By affecting the incentives, guidelines, and standards of fiscal living, it transforms how we communicate, learn, entertain ourselves, and relate to one another and how we are aware of ourselves as human being[ emphasis mine ].
Furthermore, the sense that new technologies are being developed and implemented at an increasingly rapid gait has an impact on human identities, parishes, and political structures.”
Here is a universally worded 2019 agreement between the World Economic Forum and the United Commonwealth that rosters the Fourth Industrial Revolution as one of the areas for cooperation( more about it in my interview with Mary Otto-Chang, a former UN employee ).
“Collaboration between the UN and the Forum to meet the needs of the Fourth Industrial Revolution[ emphasis mine] will seek to advance world-wide analysis, exchange and standards for digital governance and digital inclusiveness; and promote public-private partnerships to address global reskilling and lifetime read for the future requirements for work and preparing the world’s 1.8 billion young people for this transition.”
Here is a 2018 tweet by Matt Hancock boasting him along with Klaus Schwab, all impetuou about the Fourth Industrial Revolution, apparently( meaning, Hancock is skittish, Schwab is never giddy ).
And here is a section on the official UK government website talking about the … you guessed it
“Biological and digital systems are converging
“IoB devices can track
See that bit about “manipulation of neural structure and cognitive
And if you think that all this is about “foreign enemy influences, ” take a look at the care of domestic citizens in New Zealand and in Canada.
In March 2019
“The year is 2034. The world is divided into protected biometric data zones
Powerful companies mine everyone else’s biodata
“It sounds like a hellish dystopia
She laid out this dystopian scenario at the South By Southwest conference in Austin over the weekend. It’s based on one of the biggest societal trends Webb is seeing right now: that privacy is dead.”
Another interesting character is the best-selling author who has been lauded by famous people like Obama
In his 2021 60 Minutes presentation
My response to him: This is Theranos. Luscious funding of the IoB proves only that human beings can act foolish
From Conspiracy Theory to Conspiracy Practice: A Life Cycle
Here’s my conspiracy hypothesi about the life cycle of plot speculations. Typically, when there is a nefarious or agenda or a corporate pattern that is harmful to the people, the word firstly gets out in the form of a “crazy conspiracy theory.” Those who notice a problem( the toxicity of Teflon; Vioxx mischief; the issue with asbestos, etc .,) try to speak out — and they get initially rejected based on sounding “too weird.”( By the road, if there were no schemes, why would there be RICO ?)
As it happens, at first, the media disavows the existence of any scheme or wrongdoing. At the same time, corporate spies and professional infiltrators — some constituting as “respectable citizens, ” and some, as extra obnoxious and unruly conspiracy theoreticians — make sure that there is noise but no clarity and no serious debate.
Academics, if they acknowledge it at all, snub the question with an aura of enormous arrogance — while the people attracted to sensationalism and belief go for the most dogmatic and sensationalized explanation of the scheme assumption — which is then used by conspiracy theory skeptics, academics, agents on the part of states, and corporate sees to “prove” that the entire thing is ungrounded and ridiculous.
And so it croaks! And as long as the talk is harmless to the conspirators or wrongdoers in practical terms and doesn’t get in their channel , no one in power cautions. Which is why, for example, in the USSR, where people took art and language the earnestly, censoring was real — whereas in the “old normal” West, for the most part, parties could talk all they demanded as long as they didn’t move the dial. Those who moved the dial though got the same treatment as the Soviet political prisoners.
Which is also why prior to 2020, it was mostly okay to talk about transhumanism with notion — but now that the superwealthy tribes are pursuing transhumanism in a practical demeanour, it’s important for them to make sure that bringing it up is perceived by the general public as “crazy” — which will be the case up until the moment the barbarian is released.
The moment it’s out, it will stop being a “crazy conspiracy theory” and become the “great new idea that will change our lives for the better, ” TED talks and all. And it will be a “crazy conspiracy theory” to suggest that it’s bad for us!
Exhibit A: The Chip
And here is Klaus Schwab advertising “the chip” — the respectable chip:
Exhibit B: Apple Slowing Down Older iPhone Models
This one is a very innocent conspiracy theory comparing to the other ones. Remember the one about Apple deliberately slowing down older designs to “incentivize” people to buy newer ones? Well, it turned out, it was true!
Exhibit C: Weather Modification
It could easily be one of the “craziest” conspiracy theories out there
Exhibit D: Vaccine Passports Come Digital Wallets
I do still remember the time when any mention of a vaccine passport by a “crazy conspiracy theorist” was met with laughter!
And here is the Diet ID
And here’s a very helpful digital ID from Thales in the UK:
“Why is Digital ID needed now? Over the last 18 months
“Even as we start to return to a sense of normality
“So-called digital ‘vaccination passports’ will play a key role in enabling citizens to access all manner of services and will act as a precursor to the rollout of mobile digital ID.”
Graphene-based Materials and Nano-tech in Vaccines
But it doesn’t matter! Like I mentioned earlier
Intranasal Influence Vaccine Using Graphene Oxide From Georgia State University and Emory
For example here is a paper called
“Researchers at Georgia State University and Emory University have developed an intranasal influenza vaccine using recombinant hemagglutinin (HA)
There you have it! Graphene oxide! In a vaccine! No longer a conspiracy theory! We are talking graphene oxide in an intranasal vaccine application
Toxicity of Graphene-based Materials
A paper in Particle and Fiber Toxicology
“FNs can induce acute and chronic injuries in tissues by penetrating through the blood-air barrier
It needs to point out that there are several factors which largely influence the toxicity of GFNs
“Pregnant mice had abortions at all dose
Another article titled
In other words
“Nanoscalar robotics can be used as both sensors and receiver-delivery devices
As recent studies have indicated
And here is from Rice University: “Nanotubes assemble! Rice introduces ‘Teslaphoresis.'”
“These nanotube wires grow and act like nerves
And the register gone on!
True, it may be tough to get your conspiracy denialist friends to discuss the topic of “nanobots in vaccines” — but maybe you can interest them in an inquiry into the Internet of Torso?
About the Author
To find more of Tessa Lena’s work, be sure to check out her bio, Tessa Fights Robots.
Read more: articles.mercola.com