Spider-Man has gone through three different versions on the big screen, but how old-time were these performers when they frisked teenage Peter Parker? Spider-Man has been adapted to different media for years, but outside the comic book sheets, he’s best known for his live-action movies. After a couple of TV movies, Peter Parker uttered the startle to the big screen in 2002 with Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man, which introduced Tobey Maguire as the claim hero.

After two sequels, Spider-Man went through its first reboot in 2012 with The Amazing Spider-Man , now with Andrew Garfield as Peter Parker. The underperformance of The Amazing Spider-Man 2 put a stop to this version and most of the contrived spin-offs, but after Sony and Marvel reached a deal that allows the web-slinger to be part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, the character was rebooted once again. Now played by Tom Holland, this new version of Spider-Man represented his debut in Captain America: Civil War before jump-start to his first solo undertaking in Spider-Man: Homecoming. Spidey went on to appear in Avengers: Infinity War and Avengers: Endgame, with his second solo movie, Spider-Man: Far From Home, closing the Infinity Saga.

Related: Spider-Man: The Actor Who Almost Played Peter Parker In Sam Raimi’s Movie

All editions have been different, each with their strengths and weaknesses, but one big difference between the three is their age. Peter Parker “mustve been” 15 -1 7 years old, but the actors who have played him haven’t always been close to that senility. Here’s how aged each Spider-Man actor was as youthful Peter Parker.

Tobey Maguire was the first one to play Peter Parker on the big screen in Sam Raimi’s 2002 cinema. Spider-Man invested times in the developing hell, and when the project eventually got a release date, it was pushed back a year, and so it officially began filming in early 2001. At that item, Maguire was 26 -years old, and Peter Parker was a high-school major, with the script is a reference to him as a 17 -year old. The senility discrepancies between the main actors in Raimi’s Spider-Man trilogy is an often blamed item( James Franco was 23 and Kirsten Dunst was 19 ), as it wasn’t plausible that they were playing high-schoolers. Spider-Man 2 and Spider-Man 3 looked a more mature Peter Parker who wasn’t a teenager anymore, and he was around 19 -2 1 in the second film and probably 22 -2 4 in the third, with Maguire being 28 and 31 when filming.

The Amazing Spider-Man encountered its Peter Parker in Andrew Garfield, who wasn’t a adolescent either. The Amazing Spider-Man was released in 2012, but filming began in 2010. That wants Garfield was 27 -years old when he first represented youthful Peter Parker, who in this version was also 17 -years old. The sequel arrived two years later, and pictured Peter in his high school graduation, so he should have been 18 -years old, while Garfield was already 30 when filming began in 2013.

The MCU has a younger form of Peter Parker and with that a younger actor playing the role: Tom Holland. Peter Parker was 15 -years old in Spider-Man: Homecoming, which began filming in 2016 and was released a year later. At the time of filming, Tom Holland was 20 -years old, forming him a very young actor to play teenage Peter Parker– and the one closest to the character’s age. Now, Spider-Man: Far From Home has just taken place 5 year after the snap in Avengers: Infinity War, which means that Peter should have been 21, but as he was snarled, he came back as his 16 -year age-old ego. Far From Home was released in 2019 and was filmed in 2018, definition Holland was 22 -years old. Holland continues to be closer to Peter’s age than Maguire and Garfield were, but the MCU risks becoming the age chink between performer and reputation bigger.

Next: Tom Holland Is The Best Spider-Man( Yes, Better Than Tobey Maguire& Andrew Garfield )

Read more: screenrant.com