In this interview, Alix Mayer explains why our children are being so aggressively aimed at providing the COVID-1 9 dose even though they’re not at risk of serious SARS-CoV-2 illnes, and clarifies the status of Comirnaty.

Mayer, committee chairperson of Children’s Health Defense — California Chapter, is herself vaccine injured; not from the COVID jab, but from a series of inoculations she received 20 year ago.( On a line-up document, her great-great-grandfather was Oscar Mayer, founder of the Oscar Mayer corporation, which the family sold to General Foods in 1981.)

Mayer graduated from Duke University with a BA and from Northwestern University with an MBA in finance and management strategy. She worked for Apple in the mid-1 990 s. When she was 29, Apple promoted her to acting manager of worldwide customer research.

In preparation for a family trip to Bali, medical doctors recommended getting six vaccines: hepatitis A vaccine, hepatitis B inoculation, diphtheria, tetanus, polio and oral typhoid, which she did. Eventually, 13 years later, she eventually realise it was these shots that triggered her health problems.

“They gave me brain damage and total disability, ” she says. “I wasted three years in my early 30 s being 80% housebound, and I certainly I didn’t know if I was ever going to get better.

I went through a entire cluster of diagnosings: lupus, chronic myalgic encephalomyelitis, Lyme disease. Ultimately , none of those reached ability and nothing of the treatments established me any better, until we set the segments together and figured out that I was actually vaccine injured.

It’s literally simply a cause and effect. If you looked at at my autobiography and lay out my inoculation schedule, you can see that my state waned 2 weeks after I got the vaccines.

I had encephalitis and encephalopathy … digestive questions, hypersomnia — sleeping 16 hours a day — flu-like manifestations, a 24/7 migraine, joint anguish. I certainly had no life at all in my early 30 s until I went on a gluten-free diet. That started my health recovery.

I then became an award-winning medical columnist with a assortment of different blogs, and then a state consultant. In 2018, I retired from all that and assembled Children’s Health Defense.”

The COVID Jab Tragedy

While numerous vaccines have a questionable safety profile, specially when blended, data regarding the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System( VAERS) recommend there’s never been a vaccine as dangerous as the experimental mRNA gene transfer insertions for COVID.

What’s more, while paucity of transparency and accountability has been a chronic problem within the vaccine industry, the self-evident hazards combined with inoculations are really being highlighted by the COVID jabs.

Many now know of someone who has been injured by the COVID jab, and most seriously injured so soon after the shot that it’s hard to deny a linkage. The staggering number of hurts reported among adults who have received the COVID shot in turn highlights the madnes of reeling it out to young children.

According to Mayer, the reason they’re trying to mandate the COVID shot for children is to evade liability for injuries, because once a vaccine is on the childhood vaccination schedule, vaccine manufacturers have immunity against lawsuits for hurts.

Vaccine Makers Want Zero Liability

The COVID shots currently have legal exemption against obligation because they’re still under disaster utilization permission( EUA ). If you think BioNTech’s Comirnaty has been fully licensed, you’d be mistaken. Mayer shows 😛 TAGEND

“I put together a slip floor about Emergency Use Authorization( which you can see in the video interrogation above) because there is so much confusion over this and what’s really going on. Once you understand the genesis of EUA and the standards they have to meet in order to keep these makes on the market, then you understand the behaviour[ we’re now considering ].

They’re falling all over themselves to protect the EUAs for these products and also introduce other very confusing kinds of approval to get away with stuff. So, let me just start to clarify it right now.

This presentation is all about these three strangleholds that the inoculation creators and our authority are never going to let go of … These are the things they’re warding with their lives.

First of all, they need to guard the emergency … so they cannot have any early treatments. Those cannot exist. They’re likewise going for full indebtednes armour, and children will be used as pawns to get them full drawback protection.

Vaccine producers adoration EUA products because they have this huge liability shield. If you’re injured by an EUA vaccine, you can’t sue the manufacturer, you can’t sue the person who gave it to you, you can’t sue the institution where you got the shot.

You have to go through something called the CICP, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, where they’ll merely cover unpaid medical expenses, and probably merely for pharmaceutical products and lost wages.

Now, if you’re vaccine injured, let me tell you right now, you are not going to be using pharmaceuticals because they do not work for vaccine injury. They will realize you sicker. You’ll be on two dozen drugs before you know it and you’re going to be sick from those. They do not work. The only thing that’s going to get you better if you’re vaccine disabled is natural treatments …

That’s the kind of treatment you’re going to need, and that’s not even enveloped, even if you were to get compensation. Everybody I know with chronic illness, whether it’s a child or an adult who has chronic fatigue syndrome, inoculation harm, Lyme disease, they’re paying $50,000 out of pocket per year.

If you can’t work and you have to pay for your care out of pocket, I don’t know how you ever get by. People suffer like crazy, they lose dwellings, they go into bankruptcy.”

Since its inception, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program( VICP ), which pays for injuries is generated by vaccines on the childhood vaccination schedule, has paid out about one-third of claims. It’s a long, arduous process that oftentimes makes times and in the end rarely caters adequate compensation.

“If you do end up get compensation … they don’t liquidate it out in one lump sum, they pay it out year by year, and they pretty much hope that whoever is injured is actually going to die of their harms before they get balanced.

That’s been said to me a knot of periods by people who’ve been through this horrible process. Now, the CICP has only balanced 3% of claims. And so far, there are still no endorsements for[ compensation] for COVID shot gashes, ” Mayer says.[ Editor’s note: The first COVID case was recently judged “eligible” for compensation, but the case has not yet been adjudicated. 1]

Stages of Liability: EUA

In her slip appearance, Mayer evaluates each of the stages of commodity indebtednes, and whether the mRNA shots can be mandated. As mentioned, vaccine creators have no liability as long as their concoction is under EUA, as the commodity is investigational.

“Investigational is a synonym for experimental, ” Mayer says. “And the word experimental ties it instantly into the Nuremberg Code, which says that we cannot be experimented on[ without consent ]. We ever have the right to accept or refuse a medical treatment.

[ The Nuremberg Code] is not a rule, but it’s a system under which the whole world is supposed to be operating by. And it is actually codified into some local and federal regulations as well … So, what everybody needs to know is that coercion and duress are considered de facto mandates and illegal. De facto means that it’s basically the same as an outright mandate.

It’s illegal medical discrimination, medical segregation[ because that is a form of coercion or duress .] So, if you go to a diner and they challenge your inoculation passport, exclusively let you eat outside, and they are likely not let you use the bathroom, that’s medical discrimination.

That is illegal and I are not in favour of customs that do that and you shouldn’t either. Any access advantages that differ between the injected and unvaccinated are illegal, and any visual mark of vaccine status like a sticker or a bangle … that’s also illegal because that creates segregation and medical apartheid,[ since they are all forms of coercion or duress .] ”

Importantly, mass violation of the law does not constitute something legal.

“If we all drove 100 miles per hour on Interstate 80, would we watch the speed limit signs abruptly changed to 100 km / hour? No, it’s not is happening. Mass violation of the law has never made anything law. And simply because schools and businesses and our authority are mandating these shots, it doesn’t make it law. It’s all illegal …

Now, they know full well that it’s illegal to mandate these[ COVID shots ]. President Biden knows it’s illegal. But what they’re counting on is that the court cases overturning their illegal commissions will take a while, and in that interim, people are going to be scared enough to get the shots. And unfortunately, it’s worked.”

Stages of Liability: Full Licensure and Childhood Scheduling

The next stagecoach is full licensure( FDA approval ). Once a produce is fully licensed, the company becomes liable for harms. At that object, the commodity can be legally mandated. Of track, knowing how risky the COVID shots are , no creator is keen to financially accountable for injuries. They’d be litigated out of business.

This is the holy grail if you’re a manufacturer of a COVID vaccine right now. You want it to be fully licensed, but not put on the market until you get it on the children’s schedule.~ Alix Mayer

To get immunity against indebtednes again, the vaccine makes need to get their commodity onto the childhood vaccination schedule. This will also allow government to mandate the shots. As pointed out by Mayer 😛 TAGEND

“This is the holy grail if you’re a inoculation manufacturer of a COVID vaccine right now. You want it to be fully licensed, but not employed it on the market until you get it on the children’s schedule.”

DOJ Redefines Medical’ Consequence’

In Doe v. Rumsfeld, 2 the court held that service members could refuse an EUA product without punitive causes such as disgraceful exhaust or other rewards. Therefore, there were no consequences to refusing an EUA product, other than the natural ramification of possibly going the disease.

However, in July 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice attempted to redefine the expression “consequences” just for the COVID shot, had indicated that punishing repercussions, like job loss or being separated from your working or learning locale, are legal when a person refuses an EUA vaccine.

“But this type of consequence, a punitive ramification, has never been adjudicated, ” Mayer says. “That’s not in any laws. This is just an opinion from the DOJ. And it utterly means nothing, except it came from our DOJ, so parties demonstrate it a great deal of dominion.

They also stated twice — and this is so hard to understand because it’s exactly beyond intellect — that the right to accept or refuse an EUA product is ‘purely informational.’

Literally, you can read that you could die by making it, but it’s solely informational. You cannot act on it. That’s what the DOJ says. Again, it’s not decided, so it doesn’t mean anything. It’s an sentiment. It supports no legal force at all. So, as we said before, these mandates are starting to be overturned.”

Four Standards for EUA

There are four standards that must be fulfilled for an EUA. If any of these criteria are not met, EUA cannot be able to obtain or maintained. First, the secretary of Health and Human Work has to declare and maintain a state of emergency. If the emergency were to go away, all EUA products would have to come off the market. And that doesn’t exactly planned vaccines. It also includes the PCR tests and even surgical disguises.

The second standard is evidence of effectiveness. Historically, vaccines had to show a 70% or greater effectiveness, as determined by a fourfold increase in antibody status, in order to qualify. For an EUA vaccine, its efficiency and effectiveness threshold is only 30% to 50%. In another leaving from prior vaccine approvings, the COVID vaccine clinical inquiries is dependent upon the RT-PCR test , not antibodies, to demonstrate effectiveness in the small “challenge phase” of the trials.

Now, you probably heard that the Pfizer shot was 95% effective when it first reeled out, but that was relative hazard reduction , not absolute risk reduction. Confounding these two constants is a common strategy used to make a product sound far better than it actually is. The absolute probability reduction for Pfizer’s shot was just 0.84%. 3

For example, if a study fractioned parties into two groups of 1,000 and two beings in the group who didn’t get a fictional vaccine came fouled, while merely one in the inoculated group came infected, the relative probability reduction would be reported as 100%. In terms of ultimate hazard reduction, the imaginary vaccine only thwarted 1 in 1,000 from going the illnes — a very poor absolute likelihood reduction.

The take-home message here is that even though the minimal threshold for effectiveness is ludicrously low-toned, in terms of absolute risk reduction, these shots still don’t measure up. Within six months, even the relative threat reduction soles out at zero. What’s more, there’s evidence that the clinical trials were controlled as well.

“I remember an analysis very early in lockdowns[ that evidenced] if you added back all the probable cases of COVID to the clinical trial[ data ], the effectiveness went from 90% to between 19% and 29%, ”4 Mayer says.

The third standard is that the known and potential benefits of the product must outweigh the known and potential risks of the product. In the case of COVID shots, there’s overwhelming evidence describe they do more harm than good.

The fourth and last standard that must be met is there can be no adequate, approved and available alternative cares( medicines or inoculations ). “This is why hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were quashed, ” Mayer says. This is also another reason Comirnaty is not treated as a amply approved produce in the U.S ., because if it were, then all the other COVID shots that are under EUA would have to be removed from the market.

“This is a four-legged stool, ” Mayer says. “If any one of these legs goes away, you have to make your EUA products off world markets … by ordinance. I kept[ territory of] disaster and[ medicine] alternatives in scarlet, because those are two of the things that they have a stranglehold on; those are things they are guarding like crazy.

This means that every variant that comes out, they have to make it sound super shocking to keep the emergency extending. So, the variances suffice a purpose. You have to think about these discrepancies in the context of this crime, where they have to keep the emergency going to keep their commodities on world markets.

You would think this emergency would stop maybe when we get to herd immunity, maybe if we get 90% vaccination uptake, maybe COVID is just going to go away, like smallpox done so in the early 1900 s[ even if they are] exclusively 5% of parties were inoculated.[ But it won’t] go away[ until] the shots get full sanction and the manufacturers get a full drawback shield.”

Comirnaty’s Quasi Approval

With regard to Comirnaty, is it or is it not fully approved and licensed? The rebut is more complicated than a simple yes or no. Mayer shows 😛 TAGEND

“Comirnaty’s quasi approval is just for BioNTech. It doesn’t have to do with Pfizer, and this is why I’m doing this presentation because I’m going to explain what’s going on with that.

This is the race to get drawback defence. Remember, that’s the other stranglehold that they miss. They really want to get this liability protection. Once the COVID shots are fully approved, the manufacturer has full drawback.

There’s all this disarray about Comirnaty. Was it amply approved? Is it on world markets? Is it interchangeable with the Pfizer shot? And does it impel the COVID shot mandate legal? It’s all the same answer. No , no , no , no.

The FDA problem an intentionally confusing biological permission application approval for Comirnaty. It was an unprecedented approval to both license the Comirnaty shot, saying it’s’ interchangeable’ with the Pfizer shot. But they also said it’s’ legally distinct.’

In that same endorsement, they retain the vaccine’s liability shield by designating it EUA as well. They want it to be fully approved, but they crave the liability protection, so they did this BS dual approval.

So,[ Comirnaty] is licensed to be manufactured, introduced into state commerce and marketed, but it’s not licensed to be given to anyone, and it’s not available in the United Position. It’s available in the U.K ., New Zealand and other locates, but it is not available in the United Commonwealth because they’re really scared of liability.

Now, are you ready for this one? The BLA actually states that Comirnaty is only’ ready for approval.’5 It doesn’t say it’s approved anywhere in the document. And they embed this usage in a pediatric section to confuse people even more.

Here’s what they said;’ We’re deferring submission of your pediatric studies for ages younger than 16. For this application, because this product is ready for approval for be utilized in beings 16 years of age and older, as pediatric studies for younger ages have not been completed.’

Why did they do this? Sixteen is a very important number. You used to think the age fragment would be 18. That’s a very typical age break for everything else that we do in this country. Why 16?

The reason they did 16 is because 16 – and 17 -year-olds are still on the children’s vaccination schedule. And then the manufacturer does full indebtednes protection. That’s why this is ready to be approved for 16 and up , not 18 and up.”

Comirnaty Is Not Fully Licensed

This confusion is clearly intentional. On the one hand, the FDA claims Comirnaty is interchangeable with the Pfizer shot, yet it’s too legally distinct. Fields have had to weigh in on the matter, and a federal reviewer recently spurned the DoD claim that the two shots are interchangeable. They’re not interchangeable. That implies Comirnaty vaccine is still EUA. It doesn’t have full approval and it’s not on the market.

“Military members involved in lawsuits are challenging the military’s COVID vaccine mandatory. They registered an amended accusation endeavouring a brand-new injunction after the referee last-place month spurned the assertion that the Pfizer COVID shot and BioNTech’s Comirnaty are interchangeable. So, we’re still hammering on this legally, but a court has ruled that they’re not interchangeable.

[ Editor’s note: The information collected is accurate at the time of the interview, but legal challenges are ongoing and fields may publish brand-new verdicts. December 22, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court announced6 it has slated January 7, 2022, to hear reasons challenging Biden’s vaccine and testing commissions .]

So, how do we know that Comirnaty is not being treated as perfectly approved? First, the approbation states you have the right to accept or refuse the product. That represents it’s an EUA. Second, it’s not available in the U.S. because Comirnaty doesn’t have indebtednes shelter. Third, if it were available, it’s an alternative[ treatment] and all other EUA shots would have to come off the market.

No. 4, the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices( ACIP) would have to recommend it for ages 16 to 18 and the CDC would have added it to the children’s recommended schedule. That’s how we know it’s not fully approved and on world markets.

Here is the label for Comirnaty. It says it’s emergency use authorization. It doesn’t say it’s fully approved, because it’s not. But look at the safety information they are recognizing: Myocarditis and pericarditis have occurred in some people who’ve received the vaccine, more commonly in males under 40 years of age than among females and older males.

So, this is saying that young men are getting heart inflammation. And what we know from all the anecdotal reports is 300 athletes have died or crumbled on the field, and children in class going to die of heart attacks. That’s what’s going on here.

And the reason they have to declare this is because they know it. They know it’s happening. And the only way they can be indicted is if they know there’s a problem with their vaccine and they don’t declare it. So, they certify it now, in very mild language as if it’s not that big of a agreement, but it’s a very big deal. Young beings are dying[ from the shots] who have a 99.9973% likelihood of recovering from COVID …

The holy grail is to get the shot on the CDC recommended planned “for childrens”, because then it gets full obligation defence in agreement with the 1986 Act. This is why they’re starting after our children when they have a 99.9973% recovery charge …

Every medical involvement is a risk benefit equation, and it doesn’t calculate for adolescents at all. They should never be going COVID shots. The shots don’t prevent transmission. They don’t prevent bags. They don’t prevent hospitalization or death.”

How You Can Help

Children’s Health Defense has indicted the FDA over the approval of Comirnaty, alleging that this is a “bait and switch” to convince people they are receiving a licensed vaccine, when in fact they are getting an EUA vaccine that cannot be lawfully mandated. Unfortunately, the type of legal specimen can take a long time, and children are being needlessly injured while awaiting law explain.

They also have a couple dozen other legal occurrences underway. If you want to help, please sign up to become a member on childrenshealthdefense.org. It’s simply $10 for a lifetime membership.

“That truly helps us with stand in our legal events, because the more people we represent, the most powerful our instances are, ” Mayer says. If you’re in California, you can join the neighbourhood chapter at ca.childrenshealthdefense.org. You can also help by acquiring Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s book “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health.”

This book is an absolute must-read and you know people are enjoying it as it has been No. 1 on Amazon for the last month, which is very unusual for a bible. It will likely be one of the top best sellers of the entire year. So, get your copy before Sen. Elizabeth Warren convinces Amazon to ban it!

Read more: articles.mercola.com