Attorney General Merrick Garland on Thursday rebuilt the ability for migration reviewers to press pause on the certain removals, including examples considered low-toned priority or where an immigrant has a petition pending and shouldn’t be deported while that’s decided. The decision, which overturns policy by Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III, could hugely lash the immigration backlog, the American Immigration Lawyers Association said.

“With this decision the Attorney general has reinstated the ability for in-migration guess to manage their cases moderately and efficiently, by sacrifice them back the ability to administratively close cases when that is warranted, ” said President-elect Jeremy McKinney. “This has the potential to alter hundreds of thousands of cases out of the 1.3 million action backlog and imparting improved efficiency back to the process.”

“For the non-lawyers, administrative closure is a way to press interval on a expulsion suit, ” tweeted Michael Kagan, lead of the UNLV Immigration Clinic. “Doing that is a way to perform the system more rational, so that people who have pending visa applications are not dictated evicted even though they might be eligible to stay legally.”

I planned I’m no immigration law expert, but that just seems like common sense, right? But while Sessions’ announcement in the Matter of Castro-Tum back in 2018 claimed to promote the rule of law in the immigration system, AILA said the decision ”had been weaponized by the Trump administration to strip immigration reviewers of their authority to administratively close lawsuits, thereby forcing more clients to stay in the backlog and block the immigration courts.”

Attorney Karen Tumlin said Sessions’ decision pressured the reopening of over 350,000 cases, including those of Deferred Action for Childhood Advent( DACA) recipients. She wrote that one person she represented “was threatened with deportation despite being in valid DACA status, ” she continued. “Today’s decision ends the constant fear that hundreds of thousands have faced. I am so grateful to see this needed change.”

Matter of Castro-Tum was just one of the strikes Sessions performed in taking a sledgehammer to the legal immigration system as united states attorney general. Another decision by Sessions–who as senator from Alabama was boss to former White House aide and noted white supremacist Stephen Miller–ordered immigration referees to stop granting asylum to most victims of domestic violence. That decision was also overruled by Garland last month in a move widely celebrated by vulnerable people and their advocates.

Asylum-seeker Maribel said in the following statement from the Welcome With Dignity campaign that she was “thrilled to hear about these critical changes to the law–I know it is going to change my life, and the life of so many women who, like me, are survivors of domestic abuse.” Asylum-seeker Leticia said in the statement that “[ i] f I prevail my suit, I will be happy and I will feel free. I feel like God is giving me another chance.”

AILA Executive Director Benjamin Johnson said Garland’s latest decision “is a relief to pedigrees and communities across the nation today. We welcome this return to a more effective and efficient immigration court system. A key judicial power has been restored to immigration evaluates who are best positioned to manage their dockets. The inevitability of the present decision exclusively underscores the need for a truly independent migration court system to protect due process and help ensure justice and fairness under our laws.”

Read more: feeds.dailykosmedia.com