Documents abducted by the U.K. Parliament show that Facebook tried to hide the fact because this is recording call and text records from Android users.
“Facebook is aware of the fact that the changes to their own policies on the Android mobile phone system, which enabled the Facebook app to collect a record of calls and texts sent by the user would be controversial. To blunt any bad PR, Facebook planned to make it as hard of probable for users to know that this was one of the underlying features of the amend of their app, ” wrote MP Damian Collins, who led the charge to obtain the records in November.
An email between Michael LeBeau, a make director at Facebook at the time, Yul Kwon, who is now the Director of Product Management at Facebook, and others discussed the rollout of Facebook’s decision to record call and text enter on Android phones as part of an upgrade.
“Hey chaps, as you know all the emergence crew is scheming on sending a dispensations updated information on Android at the end of this month, ” Lebeau wrote. “They are going to include the’ speak summon log’ permission, which will prompt the Android allows dialog on update, asking customers to accept the update. They will then accommodate an in-app opt in NUX[ brand-new user knowledge] for a feature that would allow us to continuously upload your SMS and call record record to Facebook, ” to add to the user experience, he continued.
“This is a moderately highrisk circumstance to do from a PR perspective but it appears that the raise crew will bill ahead and do it, ” Le Beau accepted.
Kwon replied, “The Growth team is now exploring a direction where we only request Read Call Log permission, and hold back on requesting any other assents for now.
Based on their initial testing, it seems this would allow us to upgrade users without subjecting them to an Android assents dialog at all. It would still be a smashing change, so users would have to click to upgrade, but no dispensations dialog screen.”
That implied Facebook’s switch to recording users’ calls and texts “wouldve been” rolled in with Android’s previously loose permissions–without a separate dialogue chest asking users’ permission to have their logs recorded.
When news about Facebook’s habit of recording call and verse logs separated in March, Facebook insisted that users had opted into it.
Many consumers said this wasn’t the case, and the dialogue carton that Facebook claims queries Android consumers for permission to access their call and text records simply asked if the company could continuously download information about contacts–it didn’t specifically say what that datum was.
Read the documents here.
The post Facebook docs reveal company hid update about entering Android call logs loomed first on The Daily Dot.
Read more: dailydot.com
Recent Comments