In an unique( probably the first for any Indian PM) lecture in Parliament, PM Modi commented on what the IAS, or even the entire civil services society, could do better. Specifically, he mentioned four things — a) a need to change the negative attitudes of disdain, doubt and cynicism towards the private sector and profit-making entities, b) questioned why babus need to run everything( from fertiliser embeds to airlines, c) emphasised the private sector as a necessary and equal stakeholder in the country’s progress, d) ask him where will India contact if the whole country is handed back in the sides of babus? Accounts like these intimate a major transformation in how the top leadership of the country studies, which incidentally likewise mirrors the thinking of millions of India’s youth. Progress, especially the “$ 5 trillion GDP goal” kind of progress, is absolutely impossible without a thriving private sector. And more, our babus have not evolved as fast to fit in with the brand-new financial endeavours of India. In fact,’ babu’ has now become a mildly pejorative term — proposing someone old-fashioned, who makes red-tape, hinders things down and enjoys tormenting others with their power.The civil service employees society does need to take some responsibility. However, putting the entire condemn on them would neither solve anything nor will it be completely fair.There are various cause why the IAS( and the other civil servants) are the method then there, which we need to understand if we truly want to fix things.The single biggest reason for a sub-optimal civil service is a altogether outdated and warped performance measurement structure, which incentivises the status-quo. A civil servant is never honored for making a big positive change. They are, however, penalised if things go wrong.Let’s say an IAS officer feels the current website of the public service he works for is terrible. A private conglomerate should be hired to re-do it. What’s the motivation to get this done? Why not just wait( or coast) in your job for three years, until the next post and publicity, which is essentially guaranteed if no stripes are ruffled. Now, if he were to hire a new private house, there would be a) one tonne of additional occupation coming endorsements b) someone could allege bribes were made, or perhaps bribes are actually made at some statu, c) the website may not turn out as enormous or may take longer and d) you would be bothering other’ coasting’ colleagues who hate you now for creating extra toil, rather than just waiting it out until the next promotion. Best case, even if an amazing brand-new website is initiated, the public benefits, but the IAS person who did it all goes good-for-nothing for it. What would a ordinary man do with such trade-offs? Well , good-for-nothing. Coast, wait, advertising, announcing, repeat.The problem is India as a country cannot afford to coast and wait. For while the IAS gets a promotion for coasting, India as a whole only goes left behind. India won’t rise unless we work fast, hard, become innovative, improve things and generate plans that enable us to do all that.In this aspect of warped incentives, it’s not the civil servant’s fault. He or she has been told, don’t rock the boat. Ever. If the government wants to change this, the incentive designs of the IAS and other civil services must be overhauled.However, while systemic deepens are needed, “theres anything” the civil servants’ community needs to change too. Fact is, the system may be wrong, but civil servants haven’t exactly screamed for big change. Once they get through the insanely competitive exam, there seems to be a fondness for the existing system more. Coasting could become comfy after all. Then there’s the capability, the relevant recommendations that a billionaire will come home tonight and fold hands to get something — it could get quite addictive. There’s too an acute disconnect with technology, especially amongst the older senior officers. Tech can change governance, rendered those in in-charge know the power of it. The many sluggish sarkaari websites tell you not many in the authorities concerned only knew UIs( user interface) or stimulating websites from the viewpoints of the user , not the government department itself.Some of these aspects can be fixed( convert attitudes, do tech exercise obligatory ), and need to be as they are slowing India down horribly. It is breeding crony capitalism. It is keeping us in the India of 1980 s, where a sarkari mai-baap allowed you to do business. As the PM said, hours have changed. Civil maids have to not just administer, but likewise enable progress. That’s why, it is probably better if we deepen the IAS to IES. From Indian Administrative Service to Indian Enabling Business , not just in name, but also in spirit.Chetan Bhagat is a bestselling author and a popular newspaper columnist.
Read more: economictimes.indiatimes.com