In this interview, we continue our coverage of the COVID “plandemic” by speaking to David Martin, Ph.D ., who has done a exceptional racket disclosing the paper trail behind the virus now known as SARS-CoV-2. As it turns out, this is not a novel virus at all, as patents and government subsidies detailing key features of the virus go back two decades.
Martin finished his doctorate at the University of Virginia in 1995, after which he was hired on to the medical academy module in radiology and orthopedic surgery. In 2006, he set up the first medical maneuver clinical visitations organisation for the University of Virginia — a company called IDEAmed — which attended medical manoeuvre clinical contests for U.S. Food and Drug Administration submission. So, he has an extensive background working with FDA clinical trials.
Monitoring Biological Weapons Violations
In 1998, he founded another busines called M-CAM International, which is focused on finding ways to bring intellectual property into conventional finance. M-CAM too started reviewing the U.S. patent arrangement at the request of the U.S. Congress.
In the early 2000 s, M-CAM worked with the Senate Banking Committee and was a contractor for the United Nation Treasury to uncover white collar criminal activity around intellectual property and tax fraud. In doing that work, Martin also discovered something else.
“Quite alarmingly, we observed an enormous number of patents[ detailing] biological and chemical weapon contraventions, ” Martin says. “That was not something we were looking for. I give people know this was not something we set out to find. This is something that shored in our lap.
I developed a technology a decade earlier called linguistic genomics, which is a makes by which you can look at unstructured text data and find the metaphoric symbolize inside of what is being communicated. As you can imagine, if people of affliction planned are trying to do something, they often hide what they’re doing in plain sight, but they use language that is not conventional.
So, when you find a patent, for example, on a blast-resistant pathogen from a rocket-propelled grenade — did you hear what I has been said?’ A blast-resistant pathogen from a rocket-propelled grenade.’ Does that sound like it’s a common practice to inoculate a population or does that sound like[ a bioweapon ]?
And so, concluding a number of bioweapons patents, we started taking into account some very serious things. I published once a year the literal world phonebook of every biological and chemical weapon violation that took place anywhere in the world.
[ It tells you] the who, the where, the who funded it, what their places are. It was … used by U.S. law enforcement officers, ability communities and elsewhere around the world to move things that were being done inappropriately. And, it was in 1999[ that] we started detect that there seemed to be an alarming phenomenon around coronavirus, which we’re going to get into.”
Coronavirus Identified as a Potential Vaccine Vector
As explained by Martin, in 1999, the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases( NIAID ), thoughts by Dr. Anthony Fauci, determined coronavirus as a possible inoculation vector.
At the time, the disclosed rationale was to try to come up with an HIV vaccine, and to that end, Fauci, in 1999, funded research to create “an virulent replication-defective recombinant coronavirus.”
In 2002, Ralph Baric, Ph.D. and peers at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, filed a patent on recombinant coronavirus, and within a year, we got the world’s first SARS outbreak.
The Real Tony Fauci
For more background on Fauci, be sure to read Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s book “The Real Tony Fauci, ” which details how Fauci’s promotion of AZT during the 1980 s aimed up killing hundreds of thousands of people. And the pattern we’re witnes with coronavirus is basically a repeat of previous demeanor. Martin says 😛 TAGEND
“It’s important have discovered that at the time[ in 1984 when Fauci became lead of the NIAID] we were transitioning from an STD environment in which syphilis and gonorrhea and those types of STDs were the things that we were concerned about …
HIV became a political and social hot potato because it was associated in countless respects with lifestyle branding, and as a result it became a political issue to virtually distinguish a class of the population that could be the basis for investigate without consideration.
The notion by Fauci was that parties with HIV had already induced decisions that somehow entitled them to less humanity. As a upshot, the clinical visitations around developing both control procedures as well as potential medications … were be done in order to a unusually reckless fad. Innumerable beings was killed in[ those] clinical visitations, and by the way, still are …
He has been obsessed about this HIV situation as a programme to, virtually, use humen that he determines to be some form of sub-human for clinical visitations. It is a horrific blight on the United States’ medical foundation that we have been willing to allow this to go on in the name of science, in the name of health promotion, since 1984, without any significant disruption or check.”
The First SARS Outbreak
The first SARS outbreak was carried out in late 2002 going to get 2003 in China. Curiously, before Baric’s team devised and patented a recombinant infectious replication-defective coronavirus , no one had ever heard of SARS.
“I’m not drawing a causal relationship, ” Martin says. “I’m making an observation that humans and what we call coronavirus seem to have cohabitated this dirt for hundreds of thousands of years.
And then we manipulate that[ virus] in 1999. We start playing around with putting it into different swine and different human cell direction sits, and then in 2003, we have SARS. Like a lot of other things, it’s an observation worth noting.
What prepares the observation more problematic, undoubtedly, is this was happening during the unfortunate results of the 2001 anthrax assault, which as you know came out of federal laboratories …
[ It] became very clear that this was not[ due to] a bad actor, per se. This was medical and defense research gone bad that got into the public and people died. But the real benefit, if you will, of the anthrax onslaught was the adoption of the PREP Act.”
Anthrax Attack Provided Desired Liability Removal
Inside the PREP Act we now have the carte blanche removal of liability for manufacturers of medical countermeasures. As noted by Martin, the PREP Act has “made pharmaceutical companies much more capable of instilling terror in specific populations, obliging local populations into taking an untested calibrate, and doing so with absolute impunity.”
Curiously, while Martin’s annual report on bioweapons patents was, with merely a few exceptions, acknowledged and used by agencies around the world, when it comes to the information he has amassed on coronavirus , not a single bureau in all regions of the world has been willing to address it.
“No one … seems to be willing to look at the fact that beginning in 2016 we started seeing very alarming language being used, which was’ coronavirus poised for human emergence.’ This was in patents, but also in scientific books. And when you start referring to a coronavirus supposedly positioned for human coming, after the World Health Organization has declared SARS eradicated, there’s something desperately wrong with that picture.”
Racketeering and Organized Crime
The biggest alarm bell was published February 12, 2016, by EcoHealth Alliance president Peter Daszak1 who, according to Martin, has been “the money laundering agent” for gain-of-function research coronaviruses after the U.S. implemented a postponement on that kind of research in 2014. Rather than close it down, this research was simply moved over to China instead. In 2015, Daszak territory: 2
“To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we need to increase the public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures, such as a go influenza or a pan coronavirus inoculation. A key move is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We needs to have that promotion to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors was a response if they attend advantage at the end of the process.”
That statement was made by Daszak in 2015, and was published in the spring of 2016. The account “set off alarm bells very loudly within my administration, ” Martin says, “because after having somebody who is promoting gain-of-function research, and clearly blurring the line on what is even legal … saying we need’ media to create the hype’ … and’ investors will follow if they discover profit’ … that doesn’t definitely sounds like public health.
To me, that sounds like organized crime. That sounds like racketeering, and we need to raise this issue.”
What the Coronavirus Patents Show
In all, since 2002, some 4,000 patents ought to have registered on the genome, inoculations and detection of coronavirus. Harmonizing to Martin, this is alarming, “because you don’t file patents on something that you don’t intend to commercialize.” Evidence of proposed commercialization can also be found by looking at the times of certain patents by certain companies.
April 28, 2003, the U.S. Centre for Disease Control and Prevention filed a patent on the genome of the SARS coronavirus. Five days later, Sequoia Medication received a $ 935,000 award and registered U.S. Patent 7151163 for a treatment for that same virus. How are you able register a patent for the management of a virus that was only discovered five days earlier?
“That sounds like an inside job, ” Martin says. “Because you cannot have a pathogen identified and a antidote for it in five days, when all of the information was held from the public, because when the CDC entered its patent on the genome of coronavirus, it paid to keep that patent secret.
So, person somewhere knows that this thing was going to turn out to be a moneymaker … The proliferation of proprietary limits around SARS Coronavirus probably outdoes at least by two or three times most other pathogens …
Dana Farber had a monoclonal antibody patent organization that came out of three NIH concessions. Their patent 7750123 on the monoclonal antibody for SARS-Cov treatment took place in 2003. ”
So, while we’ve been told that SARS-CoV-2 is something we’ve never seen before, there was still 4,000 patents and patent works that say otherwise. The same can be said for the testing and the COVID shots. For precedent, Pfizer entered the first S1 spike protein vaccine patent on coronavirus in 1990 — 30 years ago.
“Regardless of what part of the story we look at, the patent record is full of thousands of patents where commercial-grade interests funded by NIAID and the National Institutes of Health have been building the financial cabal around coronavirus. This is not a brand-new thing. It hasn’t been a brand-new thing.
And regrettably, we’re being told continuously that somehow or another there’s something romance about its own experience, despite the fact that every single part of what we are told is being spied with PCR … the doses, every single one of those things was well known and isolated for over 30 years.”
How Did We Get Here?
How did we get to a point where taxpayers are money study on pathogens that are being designed to sicken and kill us, only to drive profits into the drug industry and all these various patent owners, which include the government itself?
In big percentage, it goes back to the implementation of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, which allows the beneficiaries of federal concedes to file patents on employment be obtained from federally funded investigate. The plan was that the economy would benefit by allowing scientists to be industrialists first, rather than simply publishing their research.
This piece of legislation has undercut healthcare systems by bringing the patent office, the FDA and CDC into an unholy trinity that serves and promotes private pharmaceutical concerns. So, what we have now is an insidious funding loop-the-loop. Martin justifies 😛 TAGEND
“Corporations and pharma hall to get people elected. Once they’re elected, the lobbyists flow an enormous amount of money into the various NIH platforms. In the case of NIAID, since Fauci took over[ in 1984 ], $191 billion have gone through his paws. Now, is that because he’s successful?
No, as a matter of fact, under his watch, allergies and infectious diseases have increased over 60 occasions. Yet somehow or another, he’s still the director of a disappointed[ enterprise] that’s gotten $191 billion to solve a problem that is getting worse every single year.
If it was a company, we would have fuelled him. The trouble is, it’s not a company. It’s a coin laundering authority. It moves public funds through the mitts of a federal agency into the research laboratories, which ultimately are going to conduct research that is then licensed back to the benefactors, which are the pharmaceutical companies that paid to get people into position in the first place.
So, this is a revolving door problem, and the Bayh-Dole Act originated an insidious incentive that said that the only research that was going to be conducted was going to be research that ultimately would flow back to the pharmaceutical industry and create juggernauts, where the health risks of R& D was taken by the public and the benefit for that R& D was taken by the private. That’s a horrifying thing, and that is exactly what Fauci has run.”
Why Did Fauci Pick Moderna as Vaccine Frontrunner?
Martin too points out that Fauci has also lied to Congress about the NIAID’s financial interests in medications. During this pandemic, Congress and the Congressional Budget Office asked for an accounting of NIH-owned patents where they have potential business interest in the stimulants is a producer. Fauci did not disclose any of them. Instead he lied and said there are none.
“The evidence is stacked a mile long, ” Martin says. “Moderna stands alone as the only recipient of NIAID funding that fails to comply with the law and fails to disclose the federal government’s interest in their intellectual property rights.
Despite the fact that everyone knew Moderna failed to disclose the federal government’s interest in its research, Fauci picked Moderna to be the frontrunner for an untested, commercially futile and wholly unproven mRNA vaccine technology in the spring of 2020.
There was no rational justification for that, and there would have been less rational excuse, given the fact that Moderna is on record as having contravened the federal constitution, the Bayh-Dole Act, 141 terms at the time they were picked to be the winner.
This is a known fact, but it was overlooked solely, and not a single law enforcement operator anywhere in the United Mood has decided that having a criminal organization supply a commodity sounds like a bad idea.”
Abuses of Law Everywhere
Since the beginning of this pandemic, the number of rules, laws and regulations that have been broken in the name of public health boggle the memory. Even laws that are absolutely clear and in no way doubtful are being separated. For speciman, under Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, part 50 , no one can be forced or obligated into a clinical tribulation of an experimental medical product, even if it’s a pandemic countermeasure.
“It’s black and white, and this clinical inquiry does not end until 2023 in the first best instance. So, there is no such thing as an approved or even sanctioned use of a[ COVID’ vaccine’] that can be compelled on specific populations, ” Martin says.
And more they’re bribing, warning and coercing beings everywhere. The medication firms too infringed basic principles by eliminating all of the controls and giving the test vaccine to everybody in the troubles, leaving us nothing against which to liken side effects. They too do not have an independent investigational review board, or the statutorily expected endorsement processes for the protocol.
The firms themselves decided to modify their etiquettes midstream, which simply isn’t how it’s done. Basically, we do not have an actual clinical visitation on these COVID shots, because so many of the basic principles of clinical medical investigate were violated.
Collapsed Judicial System Has Put Big Pharma in Charge
The federal government is also violating the False Claims Act by telling you the COVID shots are safe and effective, when research studies are still years from nearing completion, and have been undermined in all the ways just mentioned.
“What we have is a situation where the deaths are actually considered to be acceptable, ” Martin says. “I don’t know what world you have to come from to find that term even remotely speakable. I visualize the word of that utterance is frightful … We are killing people willfully, and we are doing it with impunity in the name of what we call a love affair with science.
The only problem is we’ve desecrated discipline in the process because it turns out that when I did randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled contests, you know what I must be given to do? I had to keep the populations blinded. I had to keep it placebo-controlled for the whole clinical contest. And the above reasons I had to do that is because that’s what “the members statute” requires.
This entire process has been intentional acts of harm to humanity. And the only hope we have is a very small note in the Department of Justice opinion that took place under the Trump administration, which says that if this was based on felony plays, then the entire disaster expend license and all its benefits would collapse.
In other words, if we can show that a offense has resulted — racketeering, lying to Congress, the public coercion …[ and] in the Fauci dossier3 I outline dozens of crime misdemeanors –[ it] would bring this entire thing to its knees, because the moment the PREP Act care precipitates away from Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson& Johnson, AstraZeneca and others, I can guarantee you[ Fauci] will not be promoting a vaccine.
If they are liable for a single injury or death, they’ll pull the plug on what they know to be unsafe. That necessary law enforcement officers to do its job. And somewhere there has to be a prosecutor who’s willing to do their job … Right now, I genuinely do not think we have three tiers of authority. I don’t think there is a Department of Justice.
The judiciary is functionally gone … When we let the judiciary to be an arm of the executive[ sprig ], then what happens is we’ve actually lost the three-tiered structure of authority. And, as a result, the system crumbles. The judiciary was the only thing that was explicitly independent. We don’t tolerate magistrates to get sponsorship in safarus finance. We don’t admit adjudicates to be elected.
We appoint them, we go through an approbation process. We do all sorts of things to try to make sure the judiciary is independent. So, the only risk to the pharmaceutical industry, the only risk to an exec out of control, was the judiciary.
By collapsing the judicial system in the United State, we have effectively performed the government a servant of its sponsors — and that is the pharmaceutical industry.”
How Will It End?
With what appears to be a near-total collapse of the judiciary, it looks like we’re on a straight route to world-wide tyranny, with no itineraries of escape. Martin, however, believes there may be a way out, but it will require action on behalf of rational individuals consecrated with foresight. He justifies 😛 TAGEND
“You have to have currency to buy off politicians. Back in 2008, when we had the global financial crisis … we instituted a plan that[ will] functionally bankrupt our allotment program( Social Protection, Medicare and Medicaid) in 2028[ or 2033] …
The best math we have is that the annuities and welfare programs of the United Commonwealth functionally run out of their trust fund in 2028. What does that aim? Well, one of the things that beings overlook is there’s an unholy alliance between the insurance companies and what we call health care.
Insurance business are long-dated resource owners. These are the people who have to have money today to cover issues in the future. That’s what a long-dated asset holder is. The problem is that the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank and other central banks have hushed the value of the return on stores, so the funds are running out of money faster than expected …
You know as well as anybody else that for a politician to stand up and say,’ I’m going to abolish or greatly alter Social Security’ is the death knell to any political yearning. Tiny problem. But whether they say it or not, the trust fund runs out of money in 2028.
Now, now comes the kicker: So does the pharmaceutical industry because it turns out that the money that’s going into that plan is actually paying for the treat addiction of this country.
And if we go all the way back to 1604 — to the establishment of the British East India Company and the establishment of the Virginia Company — we’ll realize that the 400 -plus-year tradition that we have, where we have improved nation positions on the back of the treat busines, is coming to its end.
The good word for all of us is it’s going to end around 2028, because we have a convergence that they didn’t figure out how to cover up. The convergence is that the people with the money, the big-hearted pharmaceutical players, are the beneficiaries of a system that is going to bankrupt itself by virtue of their actions.
This is the brontosaurus that ate too much because it was the biggest dinosaur. And the great news is they have the intelligence the size of a pea, just like the brontosaurus. They are not smart. And the best thing we have going for us furry humen is that we actually are nimble.
Now, does that mean that we are not going to have an ounce of ache through the process? Absolutely not. There is social disruption that we can’t even imagine on the horizon in 2026, 2027 and 2028, because 86 million people will lose what they thought was going to be their retirement funds.
When we see that number now go to 100 million people, and the 100 million people are sicker because of what we’ve inserted today … those people who are going to require greater health care then are going to be faced with a bankrupt structure incapable of supporting their life and their subsistence. And that is the death knell of this story.
The best report about this is we have time if beings of good conscience get together and say,’ We’re not going to let that apocalypse arrive because we have time to start building societies that actually care for each other. We have time to start building accountability structures.
We have time to start doing things that making our social fabric together so that when that plan collapses, we can come back to a rational judgment of what life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness is’ because, until we can reclaim the sovereignty of our health, we cannot celebrate the sovereignty of our life.”
What About the 2030 Agenda?
By now, you’ve probably are aware of the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset agenda, which includes the transition to a Central Bank Digital Currency. With that, they can abolish the dollar and “reset” the entire global economy that is now tottering on its last-place leg. Nonetheless, even here there may be kink in the mean that can save us.
“Like a good[ James] Bond criminal, he’s actually oblivious of history, ” Martin says. The ground Martin remains optimistic that the Great Reset doesn’t have a chance at all to succeed is because there’s no way the global public will embrace an all-digital system that can be annihilated by an electromagnetic pulsate or electromagnetic disruption.
This year alone, we’ve seen internet collapses, strength outages and digital finance spoofs that would leave people stranded without a single penny were they reliant on an all-digital business system.
“The digital money misconception is the most bizarre and ridiculous Dr. Evil plan anybody’s ever invented, ” Martin says. “The fact of the matter is the digital currency hysterium is one of those fantastical misconceptions that unfortunately has a single-point failure.
We live in a world where actors of both revolutionary planned, and extremely, very laudable privateers and raiders are more than happy to make sure that digital currency never sees the light of day because they will, in fact, hacker, cranny and disrupt every organisation out there.
And so, I look at the whole Great Reset as enormous theater … But the entire semblance is being run because they’re out of projects. And … when the incumbency is out of bad meanings, they try urgently to action you into a behavior that you would not otherwise abode. All you have to do is just say no. Just don’t play along.”
The Financial Incentive for Depopulation
Is it possible that the COVID punches might motive premature death and be an intentional form of depopulation? Well, since we’re following the money, there’s certainly a business motivation for the purposes of the a situation. As noted by Martin, if you’ve prepared fiscal promises to people who are closing in on retirement, the fewer there are of them the better.
“The business interest for depopulation is a completely making debate, ” Martin says. He recently inspected this argument in a lecture given at the Church of Glad Tidings in Yuba City, which you can view above.
In short-lived, having people live long enough to tap into their Social Security benefits and live to the full maturity of their life insurance policies is problematic with respect to the financial collapse that is looming.
Based on these business worlds — which certainly are not advertised or publicly discussed — there’s clearly an fiscal motivation to flinch specific populations and get rid of as countless beings as is practicable before 2028. Unfortunately, based on previous lipid nanoparticle and mRNA tests, opportunities of a mass fatality occasion is high.
“There is no question … they jump-start over animal tests for a very important reason, ” Martin says. “We’ve been told it was to save time, but it wasn’t to save time.
It was to framed this particular pathogen into humanity, so that a lot of people suffer and eventually die of the impacts that we could have picked up if we had done it the traditional direction, which is seven to eight years of safety studies, before we have chosen to articulated it in the arms of humans.
That’s not which is something we did. And if we look at the safety data from animal studies on mRNA, and on the lipid nanoparticle, there is no question that there is going to be a fatality increase because of this …
But the concern I have,[ which may be] more heinous[ than] the death … is the malingering morbidity, people who will require around the clock medical care is going to be a drain that will infect our economy so deeply that we are not able to recover.
Because if “were having” people who have to stay at home with children who are sick, if we have people who have to care for elderly parents who are ill, if we have people who are caring for a spouse or a family member who are sick, that means we do not have the ability to enjoy life and liberty. And the fact is that I think we’re going to have a bigger morbidity than mortality event.”
Now, as if all of that weren’t enough, Martin has also detected CRISPR patents that describe how they can “clip” the consequences of mRNA/ DN-Abased vaccines from parties. He belief they may be building a pathogen initiate that is then introduced into the population so that they can last-minute acquaint a more expensive technology that can fix what was broken. This, regrettably, could represent survival may be based on your ability to pay.
Were There Excess Deaths Due to COVID-1 9?
To backtrack for a moment, while we’ve been told COVID-1 9 stimulated plethora deaths in 2020, one mode to double-check that is to look at the number of life insurance policies paid. And in 2020, there were actually fewer life insurance policies paid out than normal, according to Martin.
“Whose numerals are you going to believe? Are you going to believe the CDC who’s trying to pump and drop this fright campaign of parties dying, and therefore you need to have your mask on, it is required to socially length, you need to vaccinate?
Or are you going to believe the numbers from the people who actually pay demands when real human rights discontinues? It is about to change that if you look at the audited financial statements of the world’s largest life insurance companies, we can find no excess extinction indication. Is COVID so smart that it only kills the uninsured? Is that what we’re supposed to believe? ”
Live Consciously, Aligned With Health
In closing, I, like Martin, believe we can survive this and retain our liberty. But we must act. Individually, every single person needs to take actions that are in line with pro-life and liberty lessons and moralities. As suggested by Martin, deplete your money on certified organic foods and locally stretched meat to help build a healthier food system.
Make sure that what you put into your figure is aligned to your health. Make sure that what you do with your torso is aligned to your health. And then as you do that, invite other beings into living a life that in fact models that behavior, so that we start building communities of consciousness.~ David Martin, Ph.D.
Spend time with friends and family and share information. Start building a sense of community again, in whatever mode concludes smell to you. When you make a obtaining decision, analyze whether you’re supporting the evil being inflicted, or choking its fund furnish. We need to start building micro-economies that they are able last-minute grow into alternative economies. We need to start building support structures for when financing of the and health care systems break.
“The fact is we are in a very unique moment in human history, and it probably is as close to the story of Joseph in Egypt as you can get. You know the seven fat times and then the seven skinny years? Well, guess what? We have a couple of fatty years left. You know what we should be doing?
We should be investing in our networks of interactions. We should be investing in our structures of parish. We should be building those pliable fibers that hold us together because we know that there is a famine coming. And we are in a unique berth right now to actually got something about it.
So, begins with yourself. Make sure that what you put into your figure is aligned to your state. Make sure that what you do with your organization is aligned to your health. And then as you do that, invite other parties into living a life that in fact prototypes that behavior, so that we start building communities of consciousness. And as we build those communities, we will start building currencies of consciousness …
There are a bunch of ways that we can solve these problems, and we can do it using the market. We can do it consuming our consciousness, but we need our consciousness, we need our community, and the work requires our money to be organically aligned to humanity again.”
How to Break the Propaganda Cycle
Doing the things mentioned above will also further another task at hand, which is to break the hype hertz. The key, really, is to simply live your life as healthily and joyously as is practicable, so that people around you can see there are others out there who aren’t living in fear. Eventually, they’ll start seeing we are really have a choice.
“Listen, hype cannot stand against the truth of a life well lived, ” Martin says. “It can never stand against that truth. What we’re trying to do is the wrong intensity. We’re trying to confront irrationality with rationality. But what we need to be doing is being persistent in evidence up and living in a way that beings look at it and say,’ I’ll have what she’s having.’
This is your’ Harry Met Sally’ moment. This is that restaurant scene. This is your moment to be a person who outlasts the half-life of the hype reflex. And I’ve seen lane too many people try to engage forcefully during the debate where they enter into conflict and it destroys their well-being.
Don’t be the bleak exasperated one. Be the one at the counter who is the one worth looking at and becoming,’ I’ll have what he’s having. I’ll have what she’s having.’ Live a life that is desirable, and you’ll receive publicity become emasculated instantaneously …
All the time while Gov.[ Ralph] Northam here in Virginia was telling us that we could not have throngs, we continued our shops. We had our table full of 15, 20, 25 beings, and our official policy was that if you signed up for our workshop, for the time you were in our dwelling we approve you as pedigree, because the legal exception in Virginia was that family didn’t count.
So, we adopted everybody for the week. We had every kind of cousin, uncle, aunt, brother, sister, child, granny. It was all family. We went through the entire shutdown having a table full of companionship. And you know what? Everybody in the neighborhood said,’ I’d love to have what they’re having.’”
Read more: articles.mercola.com
Recent Comments