Daniel Craig’s Bond story is coming to an end with No Time To Die. What still needs to happen to complete his arc and confine off every dawdle loose end? Beginning in 2006 with Casino Royale, Daniel Craig helped usher in a brand new era for the James Bond right; a more modern, intense, visceral ilk of agent fib with less of the flounces and japes considered to be in previous cinemas. Although the sequence stuttered with Quantum of Solace 2 years later, Daniel Craig’s time as Bond stumbled a pinnacle with Skyfall in 2012 before seemingly coming back an end with Spectre in 2015. A fifth Daniel Craig James Bond enter glanced unlikely due to comments made by the actor himself but, after a inaccurate start under the direction of Danny Boyle, No Time To Die was officially demonstrated and explicitly stated to be Craig’s final jaunt in the iconic role.

Aside from the stylistic inconsistencies and distinctly modern gleam, Daniel Craig’s Bond left a legacy of continuity that other versions of the character hadn’t previously ascertained. More so than ever before, Casino Royale behaved as the opening chapter of a multi-part story that has constituted the anchor of new-era Bond, with each film bleeding into the next and sometimes even retroactively computing new information to past movies.

Related: No Time To Die: Everything We Know About Rami Malek’s Bond Villain

While this form of storytelling is perhaps more in line with what contemporary publics expect from their cinema, it also requires a level of planning and foresight that, arguably, hasn’t always been present. For example, many followers be suggested that Spectre once wrapped up Daniel Craig’s arc as James Bond in a elegant, pitch-black bow standoff, since the 2015 exertion exposed a “final villain, ” permitted Bond to demolish the inventor of his suffering and then established 007 a relatively fortunate destroy. No Time To Die’s key challenges is to elongated the current James Bond arc in a way that doesn’t feel tacked on. Fortunately, there’s still plenty Daniel Craig’s Bond still has to do before he bends out for good.

Spectre became the ambitious and controversial move of uncover all Daniel Craig’s past antagonists had been in some way connected to the eponymous criminal company, orchestrated altogether by Christoph Waltz’s Blofeld. This means that when the criminal is apprehended in the final accomplishment and Bond stands as victor, 007 is putting to rest 4 cinemas worth of baggage in one descended swoop and sees are left to assume that the arrest of Blofeld subsequently symbolizes the dissolution of SPECTRE. This labor perfectly well as an ending to Craig’s tenure, but No Time To Die is adding another bed to the mystery, shedding more question mark over Blofeld, SPECTRE and their connection to James.

The No Time To Die trailer revealed that Madeleine Swann has been obstructing trade secrets from Bond, and Blofeld knows exactly what skeletons she’s disguising. Furthermore, Bond is peeked expecting his former enemy for help, likely in order to stop Rami Malek’s brand new villain. These items promote further questions that need to be addressed before Daniel Craig hangs up his handgun. Does Swann have deeper ties to SPECTRE than she primarily let on? Is Blofeld certainly imprisoned by the uk government, or is he exactly where he wants to be?

Spectre already revealed the motivation behind Blofeld’s vendetta and the character’s influence over past villains. While it would be ridiculous for No Time To Die to backtrack on that and discover Malek’s baddie as the actual big boss of the series, it is feasible that there are further blankets to Blofeld’s plan that had still not been revealed. For example, perhaps the Nine Eyes surveillance program was just one one of the purposes of a grander strategy, or maybe being caught at the end of Spectre was a ruse in order to ensure Bond suffers more seriously further down the line. As Blofeld himself ominously retorts, “that’s friends for you…they always is common knowledge that buttons to press” – could allowing himself to be imprisoned and making Bond live a happy life with Madeleine for a little while be one of those exceedingly buttons?

Related: No Time To Die Is Fixing Spectre Mistakes In The Best Way

As with Blofeld and the shadowy presence of SPECTRE, the Vesper Lynd storyline has resonated throughout Daniel Craig’s sequence of James Bond movies. The couple firstly congregate in Casino Royale and fall madly in love, simply for Bond to find that Lynd is a double agent shortly before her death. Trying avenge for Lynd and showing the reasons behind her betrayal have been key themes over the past 3 Bond movies and even as late as Spectre, it was clear that the agent still harbored feelings for his deceased love. Once again, are moving forward with Madeleine Swann in Spectre’s closing scene appeared to put this storyline to bed, but No Time To Die has hurled a spanner in the works.

Firstly, are Bond’s doubts about Madeleine reasonable, or simply a hangover from being let down by Vesper previously? Bond might’ve “moved on” in terms of settling down with a new dame, but the shadow of his love for Lynd remains discernible in Craig’s character and Spectre’s “driving off into the sunset” final vistum perhaps isn’t enough to definitively be mentioned that 007 is over being keep lying to by Lynd and then having to watch her die. No Time To Die has the opportunity to show James Bond trust again, perhaps by received information that his mistrusts over Madeleine aren’t only what they seem. Alternatively, it’s possible that, expecting Madeleine has been guilty of some sort of betrayal, Bond forgiving her symbolically lays to rest the phantom of Vesper Lynd. In either occasion, the current Bond’s arc won’t be complete until the observe stops driving down country footpaths at high speed accusing his partner of selling him out.

Since it’s likely too late for Craig’s Bond to find a third major desire interest, No Time To Die’s preference will likely be between Bond overcoming his fears and placing his trust in Madeleine, or finding out everything about Swann was a lie and abdicating himself to the fact the Vesper was his true one-and-only. There is, of course, a third option that would mean Bond doesn’t need to get over anything…

Isn’t the death of James Bond exactly what Daniel Craig’s long-term floor arc has been building towards? The modern Bond movies transgress new ground for the right in the sense that every installment was interconnected, and with this new approach comes an apprehension for a grand finale for the character. It’s no longer enough for Bond merely to live to fight another date, and end with him in the arms of some nameless beauty, “re ready for” the next escapade to begin in a few years. Daniel Craig’s Bond has already retired on several occasions, simply to be dragged back into the fray and No Time To Die begins with the see officially done with MI6. Would it be a satisfying enough conclusion to a five-film arc if Bond was to simply open retirement another fissure at the end of Craig’s final movie?

Related: No Time To Die Trailer Breakdown: James Bond 25 Story Reveals

After frequently knowing himself back in the midst of the action, a central meaning of Craig’s Bond films has surely been that the character can’t give up his period hassle. Ligament is so intrinsically wrapped up in acting Queen and country that there is no “quiet life” waiting for him at the end. Usually, there’s simply one outcome for characters too old to fight and too stubborn to retire, and that’s an epic death doing the thing they enjoy. This theory has been compounded by reports that Lashana Lynch is showing Bond’s 007 replacement in No Time To Die, setting up a potential on-screen successor to Craig’s lead character.

Previously, Bond movies had little continuity, even between the separate actors. New incarnations of the spy would simply appear more or less amply assembled from the start. This has caused debate among love as to whether the James Bond films is within a single connection, telling the story of the same character throughout, whether “James Bond” is a code name passed down from one investigate to the next, or whether each account of Bond exists within its own timeline. There is evidence to support and deny each view and the deaths among a James Bond would certainly framed Blofeld’s cat among the doves, but after Casino Royale skidded onto the scene in a way Bond fans had never seen before, it’s only fitting that Daniel Craig exits out in similarly earth-shattering fashion in No Time To Die.

More: Blofeld Is Hannibal In No Time To Die…So Is He The REAL Villain ?

Read more: screenrant.com