Google now has a brand-new Chromecast device that seems to be taking a cue from Amazon’s Fire TV line. In fact, both the recently released Chromecast with Google TV and the Fire TV Stick 4K have quite a lot in common, in terms of design and functionality. However, for those shopping for a brand-new stream actor, which one is the better buy?
Chromecast with Google TV was unveiled in September 2020 and markings a redesign of the popular casting device that allows it to stream content independent of a portable maneuver. Meanwhile, Amazon has a variety of different versions of its own streaming inventions. When it comes to the HDMI stick form factor, the Fire TV Stick 4K, released in 2018, remains Amazon’s best alternative for streaming content.
At first glance, it is difficult to say which of these devices is better. Chromecast with Google TV and the Fire Stick 4K both come with 8GB of storage, subsistence Dolby Vision, HDR1 0 and HDR1 0+, and are capable of streaming 4K video at up to 60 fps. Their remotes have a same motif, with a sailing reverberating bordering a button to perform assortments. Though, the Fire Stick remote’s thinner pealing and larger button shapes it a lot easier to use. Both remotes also have utter exploration, with Fire Stick use Alexa and the Chromecast device apply Google Assistant. Chromecast with Google TV is slightly faster, having a 1.9 GHz quad-core CPU as opposed to the Fire Stick 4K’s 1.7 GHz one, and it also has 2GB of RAM instead of 1.5 GB. However, in practice, the two inventions seem to handle content equally well.
On the surface, the user interfaces of the Fire Stick TV 4K and Chromecast with Google TV watch the same, but there are some key changes. Both maneuvers use a home screen that examines suggestive of a stream place, with rows of video content broken into recommendations from different streaming services. However, those recommendations are largely bind to the companies’ own assistances. While the Fire TV Stick does feature some content from Netflix and other smaller streaming services, its dwelling screen is mainly littered with Amazon Prime Video content. For those without a Prime membership, this won’t be very desirable. Meanwhile, the Chromecast device incorporated into a user’s Google account, developing in an emphasis on YouTube and movie rentals from Google Play. Although, many of the rows of video content are broken into categories, peculiarity material from other streaming services, such as Netflix, Prime Video, and Disney +.
Chromecast with Google TV runs on Android TV whereas Fire Stick 4K runs on Fire OS, which is a proprietary fork of the open-source version of Android. While both operating systems have access to a large number of apps, Android TV is at a drawback now. For lesson, Fire OS has immense alternatives when it comes to web browsers. Firefox is available, but the manoeuvre too comes with Amazon Silk preinstalled, which is a good quality stock browser in its own right. Android TV, meanwhile, doesn’t have either and while one might think it would be only natural for Google Chrome to be available for Android TV, that’s not the case. Granted, these apps can be sideloaded onto the device, but without a good browser preinstalled to download the work boxes- there are some options but they’re not peculiarly superb- sideloading gets a lot more cumbersome.
One area where Chromecast comes out on top is shedding content. Through the Google Home app, users can easily cast content and share the device’s screen with the Tv. The Fire Stick 4K can also mirror content via third-party apps, but the success is mingled. Both the Chromecast with Google TV and Fire Stick 4K can be used for $49.99( C $69.99 in Canada ). So, ultimately, selecting come to what purchasers want to use the device for. If they like to rent movies and TV appearances from Google Play and cast content from their portable designs, Chromecast is the better option. However, if they require a better overall know-how, with be made available to more content via web browsing, Amazon’s Fire Stick 4K is the way to go.
Read more: screenrant.com